81-C-2985 Precedential Reversed and remanded. Processed

Descant v. Rapides Parish Police Jury

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed January 8, 1982 · 409 So. 2d 1226

Cited by

Distinguished in 1

Leonard v. Parish of Jefferson 666 So. 2d 1061 La. 1996
Leonard v. Parish of Jefferson 655 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Anthony v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 631 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Brinson v. Morgan City Housing Authority 629 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Scott v. Clark 583 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Scurria v. Madison Parish Police Jury 566 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
McCoy v. Ouachita Parish Police Jury 564 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Veazey v. Parish of Avoyelles 476 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Daigle v. Hanson 476 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Heindel v. Harley-Davidson Motorcycles 467 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985

Opinion text

409 So.2d 1226 (1982) Earl J. DESCANT v. RAPIDES PARISH POLICE JURY. No. 81-C-2985. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 8, 1982. James D. Davis of Davis & Murchison, Alexandria, for plaintiff-applicant. Alonzo P. Wilson, of Trimble, Randow, Percy, Smith, Wilson & Foote, Alexandria, for defendant-respondent. PER CURIAM. Plaintiff filed suit against Rapides Parish Police Jury for damages. Answer was filed requesting a trial by jury. Trial judge signed order granting a trial by jury as to all issues. Plaintiff filed motion to strike, requesting the order granting the jury be recalled on the ground that Rapides Parish Police Jury was not entitled to a jury trial under the provisions of La.R.S. 13:5105 which provides: No suit against the state or a state agency or a political subdivision shall be tried by a jury. The trial judge ordered that the previous order granting a jury trial be recalled and set aside and that the case be tried before a judge. On application of the Rapides Parish Police Jury, the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, finding that relator was entitled to a trial by jury, reversed the order recalling the original order granting a jury trial. Plaintiff applied to this court for certiorari to review the correctness of the ruling of the court of appeal. We find that the language of La.R.S. 13:5105 is clear: "No suit against the state or a state agency or a political subdivision shall be tried by a jury." This is a suit against such an entity. Hence, the statute prohibits a trial by jury. The court of appeal erred in ruling otherwise. Accordingly, plaintiff's application for a writ is granted. The ruling of the court of appeal is reversed. The order of the trial judge recalling the order granting a jury trial and ordering the case to be tried before a judge is reinstated. Case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with law. REVERSED AND REMANDED. LEMMON, J., concurs.