Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guidry v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc., 418 So. 2d 626.

95 citing documents.

Youngblood v. Rotor Aids, Inc. 491 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
(Emphasis supplied.)” Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Peters v. CHARITY HOSP. OF LA. 490 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Nix v. City of Houma 488 So. 2d 184 La. 1986
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Bickham v. Orleans Parish School Board 488 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In discussing this dual test for compensation, the Louisiana Supreme Court, states: An accident occurs in the course of employment when it happens during the time of employment and at a place contemplated by the employment.
Jolibois v. Hartford Acc. & Ind. Co. 486 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., 253 La.1115
Scott v. Ins. Co. of North America 485 So. 2d 50 La. 1986
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Edwards v. Exxon Co. 485 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Explained Laugharn v. Savoie 480 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
(Emphasis supplied) As explained in Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., -629 (La.1982): An accident occurs in the course of employment when it happens during the time of employment and at a place contemplated by the employment.
Nix v. City of Houma 479 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Pennington v. Reading & Bates Construction Co., (La.App.
Wallen v. Sperry Univac 482 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Adams v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., and Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., are controlling.
Clakeley v. Ochsner Foundation Hosp. 478 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
See Malone and Johnson, Workmen's Compensation, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise (2nd Ed.1980, Sec.211-217); Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Luneau v. Hanover Ins. Co. 478 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
writ denied, Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., affirmed
Johnson v. Hendrix Mfg. Co., Inc. 475 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Jepsen v. B-Con Const. Co., Inc. 475 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Furtado v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 473 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Olson v. Ins. Co. of State of Pa. 471 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
3d Cir. 1984); see also Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Tucker v. Associated Grocers, Inc. 473 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Sanchez v. Viccinelli Sheet Metal & Roofing Co. 473 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
In Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Calogero, J., for the Court, stated the causation requirement, in part, as follows: For the heart accident to arise out of or be connected with the employment, the exertion[,] stress or strain, acting upon the pre-existing disease, must be of a degree greater than that generated in every-day non-employ
Sanders v. Chesson 467 So. 2d 1388 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Harris v. Trailways Southern Lines, Inc. 467 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1983), writ denied, and Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Brossett v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 467 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Doyle, 458 So.2d at 157 ; see also Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Verrette v. Town of Ponchatoula 464 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Neelley v. New Orleans Shipyard, Inc. 463 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Mallet v. La. Nursing Homes, Inc. 459 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Doyle v. United General Ins. Co. 458 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Schneider v. Strahan 449 So. 2d 1338 La. 1984
Young v. Hercules, Inc. 449 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Blades v. Davis 446 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Painters, Inc., Guillory v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar.
Thomas v. RPM CORP. 449 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.App.
King v. Wilson Bros. Drilling Co., Inc. 441 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Roberts v. Sonic Drive in of Marksville 441 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Delhommer v. Boh Bros. Construction Co. 435 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In regard to shifting the burden of proof, defendants are correct in that this burden does not shift in heart attack cases, Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Pennington v. Reading & Bates Construction Co. 432 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
During the same term the Louisiana Supreme Court again addressed the relationship between myocardial infarctions (heart attacks) and employment in Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Shatoska v. Intern. Grain Transfer, Inc. 430 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Cornelius v. Dow Chemical Corp. 431 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Ferguson v. HDE, Inc., see also Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Roberts v. American Motorists Insurance 431 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Painters, Inc., Guillory v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar.
Lonzo v. Town of Marksville 430 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
In the recent case of Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Chapman v. Belden Corp. 428 So. 2d 396 La. 1983
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., 253 La.
Ebarb v. Insurance Co. of North America 424 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
In Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., a widow brought suit for compensation benefits after her husband died from a heart attack suffered on the job.
Urbina v. Alois J. Binder Bakery, Inc. 423 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
For additional discussion of these principles, see also: Adams v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., and on rehearing, August 4,1981; Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Lindsey v. H.A.
Stevens v. Matlack, Inc. 420 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
However, in Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court had occasion to confront this issue in a case with facts and circumstances similar to those sub judi-ce 3 .
Daily v. Bechtel Power Corp. 420 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Co., and Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Hammond v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 419 So. 2d 829 La. 1982
Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (No. 81-C-3116).
Adams v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 418 So. 2d 485 La. 1982
See Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., 253 La.
Gremillion v. Babst Services, Inc. 418 So. 2d 637 La. 1982
23:1031, and is contrary to this court's holding in Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.