Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite LeBlanc v. State, 419 So. 2d 853.

85 citing documents.

Roger Vestal v. Cynthia D. Kirkland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
(four to six-inch drop off of the shoulder created a dangerous hazard); Perez v. State of Louisiana, Through the Dept. of Transp.
Vestal v. Kirkland 81 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(four to six-inch drop off of the shoulder created a dangerous hazard); Perez v. State of Louisiana, Through the Dept. of Transp.
Tonya Lynn Boudreaux v. R. E. Heidt Construction Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Everhardt v. LOUISIANA DOTD 978 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Brandy Aday v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Further, in LeBlanc [v. State, ] the court stated, “a motorist’s instinctive overreaction to an unexpected .
Aday v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 950 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Further, in LeBlanc [v. State, ] the court stated, “a motorist’s instinctive overreaction to an unexpected ...
Aday v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSPORT. 950 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Further, in LeBlanc [v. State, ] the court stated, "a motorist's instinctive overreaction to an unexpected .
Gates v. Honey 909 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Christopher Sims v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
LeBlanc v. State, Department of Highways
Sims v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 897 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
LeBlanc v. State, Department of Highways
Kimberly v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 805 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Bozeman v. State 787 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Guilliams v. Succession of Harrel 774 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
LeBlanc v. State, Department of Highways, Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., 260 La.
McReynolds v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 765 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Lee v. State, Through DOTD, 97-0350 (La.10/21/97)
Netecke v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 747 So. 2d 489 La. 1999
Gedward v. Sonnier 713 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Kessler, ; LeBlanc *778 v. State
Caruthers v. State 711 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 712 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
(4-6 inch drop-off); Guzman v. State, 95 0957, pp. 6-7 (La.App.
Tassin v. State Farm Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "The Department's duty to maintain highway shoulders is imposed to protect a motorist from the risk of injury produced by a combination of the motorist's inadvertent encounter with an unexpected, sharp dropoff from the roadway and her consequent instinctive oversteer
Badeaux v. STATE, DOTD 690 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Rue v. State, Department of Highways
Odom v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 688 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
The supreme court has held that a motorist has a right to assume that a highway shoulder, the function of which is to accommodate motor vehicles intentionally or unintentionally driven thereon, is maintained in a reasonably safe condition.
Thornhill v. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. 676 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Shephard ex rel. Shephard v. Scheeler 674 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Co., -72 (La.1986); Sinitierre (sic) v. Lavergne, State Farm Mut.
Spiller v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 668 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Guzman v. State 664 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
(4-6 inch drop off); Hood v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 587 So.2d *1349 755, 759 (La.App.
Duplantis v. Danos 664 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Bessard v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Development 645 So. 2d 1134 La. 1994
d its shoulders reasonably safe."); Oster, supra, at 1291 ("Rather, the law requires DOTD to maintain the roadways and shoulders of the roads under its control in a reasonably safe condition for vehicular travel."); ("DOTD's duty to travelers is to keep the state's highways and their shoulders in a reasonably safe condition" ); Myers, supra, at 1171-72 ( Id.
Green v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 635 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
DOTD has a duty to keep the State’s highways and their shoulders in a reasonably safe condition
Ryland v. Liberty Lloyds Ins. Co. 630 So. 2d 1289 La. 1994
Begnaud v. Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 631 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Myers v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins.
Hunter v. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 620 So. 2d 1149 La. 1993
Smith v. City of New Orleans 616 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Mathieu v. STATE, DOTD 598 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
LeBlanc v. State, Department of Highways
Hood v. State Through DOTD 587 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
LeBlanc v. State, Department of Highways, Grappe v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, (La.App.
Roberts v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. 576 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Rue v. State, Department of Highways, supra .
Roberts v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 576 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Rue v. State, Department of Highways, supra.
Kessler v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co. 573 So. 2d 476 La. 1991
Hill v. Lundin Assoc., Inc., 260 La.
Rochelle v. STATE, DOTD 570 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
the Supreme Court held that the department's duty to maintain highway shoulders is imposed to protect a motorist from the risk of injury produced by a combination of the motorist's inadvertent encounter with an unexpected, sharp drop-off from the roadway, and her consequent instinctive oversteering of her v
Williams v. Markel Lumber Co. 566 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
1982); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Dodson v. Webster Parish Police Jury 564 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Brooks v. City of Baton Rouge 558 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
when faced with a similar instinctive reaction, the court said: "the natural instinct of an ordinary driver, without prior warning or specific training, is to attempt to regain immediate entry onto the highway, thereby creating a risk of loss of control.
Bush v. STATE EX REL. LA. DOTD 542 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
LeBlanc v. State of Louisiana, Department of Highways
Bush v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 542 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
LeBlanc v. State of Louisiana, Department of Highways
Manasco v. Poplus 530 So. 2d 548 La. 1988
Michel v. Ascension Parish Police Jury 524 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Wall v. Alleman 519 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Moon v. City of Baton Rouge 522 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Sinitiere, supra at 825 .
Manasco v. Poplus 520 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Kyle v. City of Bogalusa 506 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The trial court, in its reasons for judgment, for the proposition that "[a] highway without a shoulder or one which never permits safe deviation from the main traffic lanes would be intolerably unsafe."
Deville v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 498 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by