Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Freeman, 411 So. 2d 1068.

44 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Reginald Ruffins La. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Martin G. Lemoine 222 So. 3d 688 La. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Channing R. Gray 218 So. 3d 40 La. 2017
State v. Taylor 118 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Michael James Lacour La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Lacour 117 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Newton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3/15/11), the court explained the applicable law regarding interpretation of a statute, stating in pertinent part: For that reason, “where the words of a statute are clear and free from ambiguity, they are not to be ignored under the pretext of pursuing their spirit.” See also LSA-R.S.
State v. Newton 129 So. 3d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Petitto, 10-581, pp. 6-7 (La.3/15/11), , the court explained the applicable law regarding interpretation of a statute, stating in pertinent part: For that reason, “where the words of a statute are clear and free from ambiguity, they are not to be ignored under the pretext of pursuing their spirit.” See also LSA-R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Watts 41 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Armstard 991 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Fussell 974 So. 2d 1223 La. 2008
the First Circuit noted that this Court, in reviewing the intent evidenced within the language of a statute that prohibited the hunting of "deer" at certain times, has found "that if the legislative aim had been to make the taking of each individual deer an offense, it would have clearly expressed that inte
State v. Shaw 969 So. 2d 1233 La. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
two defendants were each convicted on three counts of hunting deer at night and three counts of hunting or taking deer in closed season.
State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
two defendants were each convicted on three counts of hunting deer at night and three counts of hunting or taking deer in closed season.
State v. Kujawa 929 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
two defendants were each convicted on three counts of hunting deer at night and three counts of hunting or taking deer in closed season.
State v. Ceaser 859 So. 2d 639 La. 2003
*647 1357 (La.1981); (La.App.
State v. Anders 820 So. 2d 513 La. 2002
State v. Williams 800 So. 2d 790 La. 2001
State v. Anders 778 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Explained State v. Antoine 721 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
we explained that: It is well established that criminal statutes are to be strictly construed and, in the absence of an express legislative intent, any doubt or ambiguity should be resolved in favor of lenity and not so as to multiply the penalty imposed.
State v. Smith 708 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Batiste 701 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
*733 The Badie court noted that criminal statutes are to be strictly construed
State v. Becnel 674 So. 2d 959 La. 1996
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co. 644 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Briggs v. Grant Parish Sheriff's Office 626 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Badie 626 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Jacomine 624 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Explained State Ex Rel. Mims v. Butler 601 So. 2d 649 La. 1992
State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Russland Enterprises 555 So. 2d 1365 La. 1990
State v. Lindsey 491 So. 2d 371 La. 1986
Accordingly, we conclude that R.S.
State v. Outlaw 485 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Juneau v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 482 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Street 480 So. 2d 309 La. 1985
State v. Guidry 467 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Hines 465 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Cannon 457 So. 2d 1177 La. 1984
State v. Jenkins 454 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Lamb 458 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 449 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Davis 448 So. 2d 645 La. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by