Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 404 So. 2d 954.

56 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Hamilton William Bynog La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Boudreaux 131 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Carter 96 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. A.D. L La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
and other cases to reverse the convictions and remand for a new trial.
State v. A.D.L. 92 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
and other cases to reverse the convictions and remand for a new trial.
State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Archie Lewis Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the court stated: Although the right to a jury trial may be waived in a non-capital case, Art. I Section 17 requires that the waiver be “knowingly and intelligently” made.
State of Louisiana v. Lloyd Fuslier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the court stated: Although the right to a jury trial may be waived in a non-capital case, Art. I Section 17 requires that the waiver be “knowingly and intelligently” made.
State v. Fuslier 954 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the court stated: Although the right to a jury trial may be waived in a non-capital case, Art. I Section 17 requires that the waiver be "knowingly and intelligently" made.
State v. Reynolds 951 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Price 952 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See State v. Campbell, 95-1409 (La.3/22/96), (per curiam) (return of non-responsive verdict); (per curiam) (verdict returned by jury composed of fewer than the correct number of jurors); (no jury trial waiver); (improperly charged by bill of information for life or capital offense).
State v. Davis 942 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Singleton 922 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Onstead 922 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Goodwin 908 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Zeringue 862 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Terrase 841 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Lokey 840 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Armant 839 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Pierre 827 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
the court stated: Although the right to a jury trial may be waived in a non-capital case, Art. I Section 17 requires that the waiver be “knowingly and intelligently” made.
State v. Brooks 814 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Barr 806 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. James 751 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
As this court stated on original appeal: and other cases to reverse the convictions and remand for a new trial.
State v. Pierre 733 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Herrera 729 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Brual 726 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Bradford 676 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. James 656 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
and other cases to reverse the convictions and remand for a new trial.
State v. Hornung 620 So. 2d 816 La. 1993
State v. Hornung 613 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Morris 607 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
the court stated: Although the right to a jury trial may be waived in a non-capital case, Art. I Section 17 requires that the waiver be "knowingly and intelligently" made.
State v. Avery 548 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Wallace 539 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
1886 , 26 L.Ed.2d 437 (1970)
State v. Burton 540 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Eppinette, supra ; (La.App.
State v. Gautreaux 537 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Ellis 525 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Miller 517 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. LeBlanc 517 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Allain 511 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Dickson 505 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
This case differs from those where the right to a jury trial is triggered by consolidation of misdemeanor offenses which expose the defendant to potential punishment (incarceration) in excess of six months, (La.
State v. Mesman 488 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Gillespie 486 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Bouche 485 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Tucker 482 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Salata 479 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Laurendine, supra
State v. Eppinette 478 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
2687 , 41 L.Ed.2d 912 (1974)
State v. Legnon 464 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Sonnier 461 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Scott 461 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968)
State v. Gardner 458 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Art. 1, § 17; State v. Williams