DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hernandez, 408 So. 2d 911.

19 citing documents.

  • State v. Brown 239 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    In State v. Hernandez , , 914 (La.
  • State v. Wells 593 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Mayes 532 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Smith 489 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Brooks 483 So. 2d 140 La. 1986
    rue that this Court has expressed its opinion that applicability of the “automobile exception” does not depend on a distinction “between a vehicle stopped while in motion and then searched (obviously, a vehicle must first be stopped before it is searched) and a vehicle parked in a public place accessible to persons who might either move it or remove evidence from the vehicle,” that question is still open in the jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court.
  • Pullin v. Louisiana State Racing Com'n 477 So. 2d 683 La. 1985
  • State v. Burks 466 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    Rehearing Denied, the Louisiana *684 Supreme Court stated: "Based on the detailed tip of a proven reliable informant who purported to have first-hand knowledge of the revealed facts, the officers clearly had probable cause to believe that the pickup truck would contain marijuana."
  • State v. Brooks 452 So. 2d 149 La. 1984
  • State v. Davis 452 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    (Lemmon, J., dissenting)
  • State v. Robinson 449 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    was justified in believing that the vehicle contained marijuana, and was entitled to immediately search the vehicle at the time of the arrest, without obtaining a warrant first.” In support of that holding, and United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 , 102 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bradley 446 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Singletary 442 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. LeCompte 441 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Montegut 439 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969)
  • State v. Kibodeaux 435 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Square 433 So. 2d 104 La. 1983
    2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981)
  • State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Aguilar v. Texas, supra .
  • State v. Duncan 420 So. 2d 1105 La. 1982
    Aguilar v. Texas, supra .
  • State v. Cunningham 412 So. 2d 1329 La. 1982
    [2] (No. 81-K-1669) was decided by this court on December 14, 1981.