Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Walters, 408 So. 2d 1337.

27 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Terraz White La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State v. Johnson 229 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
statutory construction, the difference is obvious and there seems to be, therefore, an intentional legislative disclaimer on the state’s discovery of the names of witnesses which is not paralleled as relates to defense discovery.” (La.
State v. Trung Le 188 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
8 (“[U]nless contrary to law, rulings of the trial judge in pretrial matters are generally shown great deference by this Court absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion.”) (punctuation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Eldridge Tezano, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Weathersby, 09-2407, p. 2 (La.3/12/10), -19 (La.1982)
State v. Harper 53 So. 3d 1263 La. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Roch Michael Bordelon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
in support of his position.
State v. Bordelon 48 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
in support of his position.
State v. Fleming 846 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Lindsey 844 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
to the district attorney, or to agents of the state.” See State v. Walters State v. Collins, 01-1459, p. 26 (La.App.
State v. Divers 793 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
1984); State v. Richardson, 33,272 (La.
State v. Lee 767 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
(holding that "a defendant is not usually entitled to the names of state witnesses”) (holding that art. 723 does not expressly prohibit such disclosure).
State v. Stallworth 720 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Jackson 608 So. 2d 949 La. 1992
State v. Ondek 584 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Moore 575 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Langlois 573 So. 2d 1110 La. 1991
State v. McClinton 492 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Vampran 491 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. London 478 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Lingle 461 So. 2d 1046 La. 1985
the state's argument for a strict construction of the discovery articles in the Code of Criminal Procedure was rejected.
State v. Williams 458 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Stewart 452 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
See, and the cases cited therein.
State v. Loyd 425 So. 2d 710 La. 1982
State v. Hines 422 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
State v. Solow 422 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
State v. Washington 411 So. 2d 451 La. 1982
The trial judge relied upon this Court’s
State v. Washington 411 So. 2d 451 La. 1982