Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Walgamotte, 415 So. 2d 205.
-
State v. Broussard
269 So. 3d 1094
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
532(7), 581 ; see also State v. Brown , , 1079 (La.1984) ; State v. Taylor , ; State v. Walgamotte
- State of Louisiana v. Damon Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
State v. Brown
161 So. 3d 99
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The legislatively mandated time limitations are in place “to enforce the right of an accused to a speedy trial and to prevent the oppression of citizens by suspending criminal prosecutions over them for an indefinite time.” quoting State v. Theard, 212 La.
-
State v. Brady
131 So. 3d 166
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Rome, 93-1221, pp. 3-4 (La.1/14/94), (
-
State v. Lawson
129 So. 3d 792
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/9/08), *795 207 ().
- State v. Andres 100 So. 3d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- State of Louisiana v. C.W. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- State v. Sorden 45 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State v. Thomas 928 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- State v. Williams 631 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
-
State v. Rome
630 So. 2d 1284
La. 1994
(quoting State v. Theard, 212 La.
- State v. Bennett 610 So. 2d 120 La. 1992
-
State v. Chapman
495 So. 2d 1001
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
An application for writs by the defendant would have been an interruption, but not an application by the state, C.Cr.P.
- State v. Brown 451 So. 2d 1074 La. 1984
- State v. Smith 447 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Taylor 439 So. 2d 410 La. 1983