DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wimberly, 414 So. 2d 666.

164 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Adrian Anton Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    that a presentence investigation be ordered[,]” and that “[s]uch an investigation is an aid to the court and not a right of the accused.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Hugh Gilliam La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
  • State Of Louisiana v. Noe A. Aguliar-benitez Aka Noe Aguilar-benitez La. 2021
    Telsee, 425 So.2d at 1260 ( (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tashonty C Toney La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    Soraparu, 97-1027, p. 1, 703 So.2d at 608 ( (La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Donovan Darville La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
    art. 875( A)( 1); Manasco, 2017 WL 4082286, at * 2 ( citing State a Wimberly, La.
  • State Of Louisiana Versus La. 2020
    Const. art. V, §5(A); (La.
  • Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    Owners and Citizens of State, Loeb v. Collier, 131 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Thayer Green 225 So. 3d 1033 La. 2017
    Const. art. I, § 20 by remanding if the defendant has presented “a substantial possibility that his complaints of an excessive sentence [have] merit.” (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Danial Lewayne Lafleur -Aka- Daniel Lafleur -Aka- Daniel Lee Lafleur -Aka- Danial Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentencing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant‟s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.”
  • State v. Lafleur 209 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    1979), a remand for resentencing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.”
  • Robert D. MAYEUX and Lisa M. Mayeux v. George J. CHARLET, Jr., Deceased, Charlet Funeral Home, Inc., Rev. … 203 So. 3d 1030 La. 2016
    Owners and Citizens of State, Loeb v. Collier, 131 La.
  • State v. Osborne 167 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Id.; State v. Armstrong, 32,279 (La.App.2d Cir.9/22/99), , writ denied, 99-3151 (La.4/7/00), .
  • State v. Quezada 141 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Parker 141 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Laneheart 135 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Mills 120 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Sims 106 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    ess than fully articulated record indicating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentenc-ing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.”
  • State v. Dauzart 89 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Martin 72 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    less than fully articulated record indicating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentenc-ing is appropriate only when “there appeals] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua Daniel Sibley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    A remand for resentencing on a fuller statement of reasons is necessary only when there appears “to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence [have] merit.” (emphasis added).
  • State v. Sibley 41 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    A remand for resentencing on a fuller statement of reasons is necessary only when there appears “to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence [have] merit.” (emphasis added).
  • State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Dunbar 981 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Robert 951 So. 2d 1057 La. 2007
  • In Re Miller 949 So. 2d 379 La. 2007
    Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 2 A; .
  • Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu 903 So. 2d 392 La. 2005
    Owners and Citizens of State, Loeb v. Collier, 131 La.
  • State v. Bertrand 891 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    an fully articulated record indi-, eating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for | ^resentencing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha [ve] merit.”
  • State v. Terrell 876 So. 2d 43 La. 2004
    A remand for resentencing is necessary only when the defendant presents to the reviewing court “a substantial possibility that [his] complaints of an excessive sentence [have] merit.”
  • State v. Allen 876 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • GREATER NEW ORLEANS EXPRESSWAY v. Olivier 860 So. 2d 22 La. 2003
    Owners and Citizens of State, Loeb v. Collier, 131 La.
  • State v. Rogers 862 So. 2d 963 La. 2003
  • State v. Lebreton 859 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Augillard 853 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    less than fully articulated record indicating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentenc-ing is appropriate only when “there appeals] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.”
  • State v. Simmons 848 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Smith 842 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    an fully articulated record indicating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sen *403 tence, a remand for resentenc-ing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.”
  • State v. Galliano 839 So. 2d 932 La. 2003
  • State v. Foster 834 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Jefferson 834 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Cottrell 817 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    ess than fully articulated record indicating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentenc-ing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.”
  • State v. Barnes 816 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    ess than fully articulated record indicating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentenc-ing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.” (La.
  • State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Coston 800 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    s than fully articulated record indicating hfithat it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentencing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.”
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    ess than fully articulated record indicating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentenc-ing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.”
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Camese 791 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Allen 794 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    than fully articulated record indicating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentenc-ing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a substantial possibility that the defendant’s complaints of an excessive sentence ha[ve] merit.” State *32 v. Wimberly