Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lindsey, 404 So. 2d 466.

141 citing documents.

  • State v. Chevalier 458 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Monk 454 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Birdsong 452 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); U.S. Cert denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Glass 455 So. 2d 659 La. 1984
    State v. Copeland, supra ; cert.
  • State v. Pettaway 450 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Watson 449 So. 2d 1321 La. 1984
  • State v. Wright 445 So. 2d 1198 La. 1984
  • State v. Cockerham 442 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
  • State v. Kirkpatrick 443 So. 2d 546 La. 1983
    an original hearing (La.1979).
  • State v. Benoit 440 So. 2d 129 La. 1983
    2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); cert.
  • State v. Banks 439 So. 2d 407 La. 1983
    "[t]he hearsay nature of the testimony was cured by the testimony of [the witness] which corroborated the hearsay statements."
  • State v. Willis 438 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Guillory 438 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Harvin 437 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Craddock 435 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Burdgess 434 So. 2d 1062 La. 1983
  • State v. Berry 430 So. 2d 1005 La. 1983
    In some other cases, for example, a death sentence has been reversed because speculation on a defendant's possible release from life imprisonment has been interjected into the jury's sentencing decision.
  • State v. Hernandez 432 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Kohler 434 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Banks 428 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Moore 432 So. 2d 209 La. 1983
    State v. Perry, supra ; cert.
  • State v. Lindsey 428 So. 2d 420 La. 1983
    Defendant's case was remanded to the district court, , for the empanelling of a new jury for determining anew only the issue of penalty in accordance with the procedure set out in La.Code Crim.P.
  • State v. Narcisse 426 So. 2d 118 La. 1983
  • State v. David 425 So. 2d 1241 La. 1983
  • State v. Brogdon 426 So. 2d 158 La. 1983
  • State v. Culpepper 434 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
  • State v. Watson 423 So. 2d 1130 La. 1982
  • State v. Taylor 422 So. 2d 109 La. 1982
    after the jury found that the defendant created a risk of death or great bodily harm to more than one person.
  • State v. Sawyer 422 So. 2d 95 La. 1982
    and State v. Willie , above.
  • State v. Jordan 420 So. 2d 420 La. 1982
  • State v. Copeland 419 So. 2d 899 La. 1982
    he was bound by that decision.
  • State v. Webb 419 So. 2d 436 La. 1982
  • State v. Edwards 419 So. 2d 881 La. 1982
    This court has held that a photograph need not be identified by the person who took it to be admissible, and that a photograph of a physical lineup can be admissible even where the photograph was taken in a different room than the room in which the witness actually viewed the lineup.
  • State v. Mart 419 So. 2d 1216 La. 1982
  • State v. Marshall 414 So. 2d 684 La. 1982
  • State v. Brown 414 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
  • State v. Lane 414 So. 2d 1223 La. 1982
  • State v. Farria 412 So. 2d 577 La. 1982
  • State v. Willie 410 So. 2d 1019 La. 1982
  • State v. Dupre 408 So. 2d 1229 La. 1982
    [11] this court recently expressed concern over prosecutorial comment in closing argument regarding defendant's right to appeal a jury's death sentence and to seek executive clemency following a life sentence.