Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lehnen, 403 So. 2d 683.

33 citing documents.

State v. Brown 35 So. 3d 1069 La. 2010
U.S. v. Darensbourg, 520 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.1975).
Gibson v. State 758 So. 2d 782 La. 2000
State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
Winn v. City of Alexandria 685 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Neisler 666 So. 2d 1064 La. 1996
State v. Solomon 664 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
[State u] Lingle, 436 So.2d [456] at 460-61 [ (La.1983) ]
State v. McLemore 640 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Byrd, supra ; Lingle, supra
George v. Department of Fire 637 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
685 n. 3 (La.1981); (La.App.
State v. Hunter 630 So. 2d 688 La. 1993
State v. Barrilleaux 620 So. 2d 1317 La. 1993
the court noted that a reviewing court examining a warrant with inadvertent material omissions which might have affected the issuing magistrate's decision on probable cause should add the omitted facts to the affidavit and then retest the sufficiency of the sho
Schultz v. Louisiana Department of PubLic Safety & Corrections 606 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Byrd 568 So. 2d 554 La. 1990
Lingle, 436 So.2d at 460-61
State v. Ross 561 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Lehnen, supra, [ ] at 685 n. 3 [1981].
State v. Kreitz 560 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. London 559 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Loera 530 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
State v. Roebuck 530 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Hudgins 519 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Meyers 520 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Kyles 513 So. 2d 265 La. 1987
State v. Cook 482 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Shannon 472 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
we must consider the affidavit as though the omitted facts were included and then evaluate the presence of probable cause in light of the added facts.
State v. Richmond 464 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Morris, 444 So.2d at 1203
State v. Allen 450 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Howard 448 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Howard 448 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 448 So. 2d 659 La. 1984
State v. Morris 444 So. 2d 1200 La. 1984
(inadvertent material misstatements, rather than omissions, in search warrant affidavit at issue).
State v. Tate 444 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Lingle 436 So. 2d 456 La. 1983
State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court set forth the approach to be taken when facts are omitted from a search warrant application: "The court reviewing the warrant must consider the affidavit as though the omitted facts were included and then evaluate the presence of probable cause in light of these added facts."
State v. Patterson 422 So. 2d 1131 La. 1982