Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Barrett, 408 So. 2d 903.

29 citing documents.

Shari Morman and Diana M. Walker v. James M. Leblanc, individually & as Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
e that Officer Doyle was not present on February 29, 2012, or that the arrest team did not have a search warrant when the officers entered and searched the residence Rather, the defendants argue that the parole warrant for Mr. Morman’s arrest gave the officers authority “to enter a dwelling in which the suspect lives when there is reason to believe the suspect is within,” -05 (La.
State v. Watts 223 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Gary D. Howard 226 So. 3d 419 La. 2017
State v. Lockett 120 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Bridges 104 So. 3d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Dowdell 99 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Additionally, the defendant was arrested on a warrant for a federal parole violation.
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Additionally, the defendant was arrested on a warrant for a federal parole violation.
State v. Patterson 38 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The property which was involved in the search, like the search in [State v.] Barrett, [ ] turned out not to be the property of a third party homeowner.
State v. Conway 992 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See also State v. Stephens, 40-343, pp. 3-5 (La.App.
State v. Sims 973 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Walker 953 So. 2d 786 La. 2007
2317, 2342 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) (White, J., concurring in the judgment)); (defendant not "adversely affected" by illegal entry into third person's home by police executing an arrest warrant for defendant and seizing evidence used only against defendant and not against third person).
State v. Wallace 950 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
1371 , 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980)
State v. Stephens 917 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Culotta, supra ; (La.
State v. Sims 914 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Knight 798 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
the court addressed the issue of whether “the subject of an arrest warrant in the house of a third person where entry was accomplished without a search warrant or exigent circumstances or consent, was ‘adversely affected’ 2 so as to require suppression of evidence seized incidental to his lawful arrest.” Id
State v. Crews 674 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Fort 670 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Jackson 641 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Jackson 641 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Griffin, and not Roberson, is the party claiming that she has been adversely affected because Roberson's constitutional right to be secure in his house against an unreasonable search was violated.
State v. Valrie 597 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Harmon 594 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Krempel 471 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Chimel v. California, supra
State v. Owen 453 So. 2d 1202 La. 1984
for its holding that defendants do not have standing under either the federal or state constitutions is misplaced.
State v. Weeks 449 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Cormier 438 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Johnson 437 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
a case with essentially identical facts, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a search pursuant to a valid arrest warrant was not affected by the entry into the house of a third person.
State v. Tanner 432 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); (La.