Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boyer, 406 So. 2d 143.

126 citing documents.

State v. Thomas 609 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Walker 600 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
App. 4th Cir.), writ den., State v. Shapiro, supra, at 378
State v. Bosworth 593 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Green 590 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. General Motors Corp. 582 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
1st Cir.1988), writ denied
State v. Trahan 576 So. 2d 1 La. 1991
the defendant claimed he heard a telephone ringing two separate times while he was in a detached garage, but did not hear a gunshot.
State v. Mayeaux 570 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Sheehan 558 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Washington 550 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
15:445; State v. Odom, supra.
State v. Breaux 546 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Talbert 543 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Trahan 543 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Guillory 540 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Perkins 540 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Pearce v. POWER & TELEPHONE OF KENTUCKY, INC. 533 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Shannon 531 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Maxey 527 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Neville 524 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Deville 524 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Maddox 522 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Tyner 517 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
wherein the court stated that “[i]t can be inferred from the fact that the defendant shot Mrs. Sandoz [the victim] in the head at close range that he actively desired her death to follow his act.” The relationship between defendant and the victim had not been amicable in the past.
State v. Odom 511 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Robinson 506 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Spears 504 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Thomas 504 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Perry 502 So. 2d 543 La. 1986
State v. Navarre 498 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Price 498 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Vessell 496 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Banks 496 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Williams 490 So. 2d 255 La. 1986
State v. Bahm 490 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
15:445; The facts related by the victims here were sufficient for the trial judge to conclude the defendant possessed the requisite specific intent to commit the offense.
State v. Kennedy 494 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Whitaker 489 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Smith 490 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Deaton 486 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Braggs 487 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Ward 483 So. 2d 578 La. 1986
State v. Bickman 480 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Collier 474 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Bell 471 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Thus, specific intent can be inferred when a wound is inflicted at close range, or when a weapon is pointed directly at the victim.
State v. Chairs 466 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Wiggins 465 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Johnson 461 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Bessard 461 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Ring 461 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Sanford 465 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Rankin 454 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by