Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robinson, 404 So. 2d 907.
- State v. Labuzan 480 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
-
State v. Mims
478 So. 2d 685
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Celestine, supra
-
State v. Watson
477 So. 2d 788
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed one-on-one confrontations and the established criteria for their admission at trial.
- State v. Holbrook 476 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Signal
467 So. 2d 1375
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Louisiana Supreme Court designated the appropriate criteria to be considered when examining the validity of an out-of-court identification.
-
State v. Shepard
468 So. 2d 594
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Pettaway, supra.
-
State v. Johnson
464 So. 2d 447
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Williams, supra; State v. Washington, supra
- State v. Morgan 459 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Bennett
457 So. 2d 741
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Washington, supra.
- State v. Horton 458 So. 2d 445 La. 1984
- State v. Joseph 454 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
-
State v. Celestine
452 So. 2d 676
La. 1984
State v. Williams, supra ; State v. Washington, supra
- State v. Pettaway 450 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
- State v. Watson 449 So. 2d 1321 La. 1984
- State v. Joseph 441 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Griffin
438 So. 2d 229
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
defines the discretion given a trial judge on voir dire examinations as follows: Voir dire examination is designed to test the competency and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial.
- State v. James 431 So. 2d 399 La. 1983
- State v. Kohler 434 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Stucke 419 So. 2d 939 La. 1982
-
State v. Parker
416 So. 2d 545
La. 1982
1979), this Court stated: "Voir dire examination is designed to test the competency and inpartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial."
-
State v. Williams
418 So. 2d 562
La. 1982
State v. Washington, supra
-
State v. Allen
416 So. 2d 553
La. 1982
1979), this Court stated: "Voir dire examination is designed to test the competency and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial."
- State v. Frith 412 So. 2d 1000 La. 1982