Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Poree, 406 So. 2d 546.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Erick Garrison La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 8/27/25), --- So.3d ---, 2025WL2462473, *4: For a valid search, an officer must show “a sufficient nexus between the items to be seized and the place to be searched.” United States v. McKinney, 758 F.2d 1036, 1042 (5th Cir. 1985); -48 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Keyhaid J. McGee La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
For a valid search, an officer must show “a sufficient nexus between the items to be seized and the place to be searched.” United States v. McKinney, 758 F.2d 1036, 7 1042 (5th Cir. 1985); -48 (La.
State of Louisiana v. James G. Buck La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
(La.1981); see also Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct.
State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
State v. Varnado, 95-3127, p. 2 (La.5/31/96), (-48 (La.
State v. Brooks 745 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
-48 (La.1981) (“The items sought — a handgun, clothing, money, and a money bag — are objects which one might expect to find at a person’s residence.”); , 800 n. 1 (La.1980) (“Although the property in this case could have been stored elsewhere, it was reasonable to assume that the nor
State v. Varnado 675 So. 2d 268 La. 1996
-48 (La.1981) ("The items soughta handgun, clothing, money, and a money bagare objects which one might expect to find at a person's residence."); , 800 n. 1 (La.1980) ("Although the property in this case could have been stored elsewhere, it was reasonable to assume that the normal
State v. Wilson 672 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
(cited in Davis, supra ): Without direct observation, the appropriate connection [between the sought-after items and the place to be searched] may be manifested by the type of crime, the nature of the items sought, the extent of opportunity for concealment, and normal inferences as to where a criminal w
State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
Without direct observation, the appropriate connection [between the sought-after items and the place to be searched] may be manifested by the type of crime, the nature of the items sought, the extent of opportunity for concealment, and normal inferences as to where a criminal would be likely to hide th
State v. Kreitz 560 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Harlan 556 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Rattler 532 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
He properly decided that the “facts and circumstances within the affiant’s knowledge and of which he [had] reasonable trustworthy information, [were] sufficient to support a reasonable belief *855 that an offense [had] been committed and that evidence or contraband [might have been] found at the place to be searched.”
State v. Tilley 525 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Smith 473 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Supreme Court of Louisiana said: “Probable cause exists when facts and circumstances, within the affiant’s knowledge and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense has been committed and that evidence or contraband may be found at th
State v. Manso 449 So. 2d 480 La. 1984
State v. Connella 436 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
warrant may issue only upon probable cause established to the satisfaction of the judge, by the affidavit of a credible person, reciting facts establishing the cause for issuance of the warrant.” It is well settled that “The facts establishing probable cause for a search warrant must be contained within the four corners of the affidavit.”
State v. Duncan 420 So. 2d 1105 La. 1982
see also Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct.
State v. Dillon 419 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
State v. Feeback 411 So. 2d 10 La. 1982