Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Harvill, 403 So. 2d 706.
- State of Louisiana v. Marlon Frank Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- State v. Thomas 217 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
State v. Monroe
198 So. 3d 259
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Mitchell , 2000-1399, p. 5, 779 So.2d at 701 -702 ( Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284 ; ).
-
State v. Ellis
144 So. 3d 1152
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
1755 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979); (La.
-
State v. Simms
143 So. 3d 1258
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Mitchell , 2000-1399, p. 5, 779 So.2d at 701 -702 ( Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284 ; ).
- State v. Williams 144 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Funes 88 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
State of Louisiana v. Paxton Jules Trahan
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
-
State v. Trahan
61 So. 3d 794
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
-
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
-
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
-
State v. Davis
36 So. 3d 351
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
- State v. Brister 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- State v. Bradley 858 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
-
State v. White
850 So. 2d 751
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284 ; (La.
-
State v. Mitchell
779 So. 2d 698
La. 2001
Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
-
State v. Russell
764 So. 2d 93
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
1755 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979)
-
State v. Shelvin
720 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
1755 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979); and then-validity turns on the totality of the circumstances surrounding the statement.
-
State v. Gaspard
709 So. 2d 213
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
1755 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979); (La.
-
State v. Labostrie
702 So. 2d 1194
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
1755 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979)
- State v. Edmondson 699 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-
State v. Hebert
697 So. 2d 1040
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Defendant relies on the jurisprudence which holds that when a defendant is the only person who can refute the state's evidence, *1045 an indirect reference to the defendant's failure to testify is reversible error
- State v. Brown 692 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-
State v. Ross
669 So. 2d 384
La. 1996
1755 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979); and their validity turns on the totality of the circumstances surrounding the statement.
-
State v. Samuels
657 So. 2d 562
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
1755 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979)
- State v. Clay 612 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
-
State v. Bordelon
597 So. 2d 147
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
The Louisiana Supreme Court, specifically rejected a requirement that Miranda rights be repeated before each separate interrogation period as such a requirement would "quickly degenerate into a formalistic ritual."
- State v. Johnson 595 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
-
State v. Lamark
584 So. 2d 686
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Johnson, 541 So.2d at 822 ; -711 (La.1981)
-
State v. Robinson
563 So. 2d 477
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Johnson, 541 So.2d at 822 ; -711 (La.1981); (La.
- State v. Kimble 546 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Johnson 541 So. 2d 818 La. 1989
-
State v. Mills
505 So. 2d 933
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Williams, 262 La.
- State v. Lambert 503 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Landry 463 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
-
State v. Boutte
447 So. 2d 1229
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
The defendant, in his brief
- State v. Davis 445 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Brown 445 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
-
State v. Sprinkle
439 So. 2d 1230
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Further, noted by footnote: An older line of cases, originating with State v. Howard, 262 La.
- Distinguished State v. Burkhalter 428 So. 2d 449 La. 1983
- State v. Moore 414 So. 2d 340 La. 1982