Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 406 So. 2d 1314.

27 citing documents.

  • State v. Allah 216 So. 3d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Solorzano 85 So. 3d 101 La. 2012
    Defendant's filing below, properly considered as an application for post-conviction relief, , 1316 n. 3 (La.1981); , 402 n. 2 (1980), was barred because defendant cannot satisfy the custody requirement.
  • State v. Solorzano 85 So. 3d 101 La. 2012
    Defendant’s filing below, properly considered as an application for post-conviction relief, , 1316 n. 3 (La.1981); , 402 n. 2 (1980), was barred because defendant cannot satisfy the custody requirement.
  • State v. R.A.L. 69 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Rios, 95-961 (La.App.
  • State v. RAL 69 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Rios, 95-961 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. John Jacob Farris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    -33 (La.1981) (citation omitted); see also, State v. Smith, 04-338 (La.App.
  • State v. Farris 53 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    -33 (La.1981) (citation omitted); see also, State v. Smith, 04-338 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tommy Cloud La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    art. 591, double jeopardy does not attach when a defendant himself moves to set aside his conviction
  • State v. Cloud 946 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    art. 591, double jeopardy does not attach when a defendant himself moves to set aside his conviction, (La.
  • State v. Labauve 943 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Davis 861 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Pannell 859 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Williams 839 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Montalban 810 So. 2d 1106 La. 2002
  • State v. Tran 793 So. 2d 172 La. 2001
    Tran's filing below, properly considered an application for post-conviction relief, , 1316 n. 3 (La.
  • State v. Temple 789 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Morris, 98-2684 (La.App.
  • State v. Bell 781 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    See, State v. Gross, 95-621 (La.App.
  • State v. Youngblood 740 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Hall, supra ; State v. Anderson, supra .
  • State v. Morris 729 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. King, 93-2146 (La.App.
  • State v. Gross 673 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    5th Cir. 10/25/94), ( (La.App.
  • State v. Anderson 661 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Franco 646 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Walker 645 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Alfonso 496 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    The Court, noted that although a trial court may, pursuant to C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Handley 453 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Guajardo 428 So. 2d 468 La. 1983
  • State v. Buckenburger 428 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983