Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 400 So. 2d 575.
- State of Louisiana Versus Marvin Robinson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
-
State v. Ruiz
931 So. 2d 472
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
"[t]he unconstitutionality of one portion of the statute, however, does not necessarily render the entire statute unenforceable.
-
State of Louisiana v. Gregory John Ruiz
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
“[t]he unconstitutionality of one portion of the statute, however, does not necessarily render the entire statute unenforceable.
- Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council 762 So. 2d 608 La. 2000
-
State v. Caruso
733 So. 2d 1169
La. 1999
" (Emphasis added) [5] We recognized in Lindsey that our holding conflicted with the statutory interpretation in some of our earlier cases, particularly
- State v. Loyd 689 So. 2d 1321 La. 1997
-
Harris v. Regional Transit Authority
662 So. 2d 134
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
and Humphries v. Louisiana Dept. of Public Works, Div. of Transp., (La.App.
- State v. Ritchie 590 So. 2d 1139 La. 1991
- State v. Russland Enterprises 555 So. 2d 1365 La. 1990
- Humphries v. LA. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIV. OF TRANSP. 545 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Azar 539 So. 2d 1222 La. 1989
- State v. Azar 535 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Lindsey 491 So. 2d 371 La. 1986
-
State v. Tuscano
492 So. 2d 67
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
“[t]he unconstitutionality of one portion of the statute, however, does not necessarily render the entire statute unenforceable.
- Ciolino v. Castiglia 446 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984