Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tribbet, 415 So. 2d 182.

64 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of K.B. Vs. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Charles R. Lane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Reokenski Vodise Thomas AKA Reokenski Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Thomas 258 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Smith , [ (La.1983) ] ; State v. Tribbet , ; State v. Belgard
State v. Randolph 219 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Griffin 176 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
State v. Melancon 151 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “the state cannot be charged with testimony elicited by defense counsel implying that defendant had previously committed other crimes and that defendant cannot claim reversible error on the basis of that evidence which is elicited.”
State v. Marshall 150 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Judge Marullo’s interruptions reined in the prosecutor’s commentary and ensured that the prosecutor’s statements were “nothing more than an obscure reference” and were “made without explanation or elaboration.”
State v. Augustine 125 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Supreme Court held that “the state cannot be charged with testimony elicited by defense counsel implying that defendant had previously committed other crimes and that defendant cannot claim reversible error on the basis of that evidence which is elicited.”
State v. Chisolm 74 So. 3d 242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Russell 73 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Friday 73 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-85 (La.1982); -71 (La.1977).
State of Louisiana v. Theron J. Chaisson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
In so doing, (La.1982), for the premise that “the state cannot be charged with testimony elicited by defense counsel implying that the defendant had previously committed the other crimes, and the defendant cannot claim reversible error on the basis of that which he elicited.” Johnson, 951 So.2d at 301; see also State v. Dozier
State v. Chaisson 20 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In so doing, , (La.1982), for the premise that “the state cannot be charged with testimony elicited by defense counsel implying that the defendant had previously committed the other crimes, and the defendant cannot claim reversible error on the basis of that which he elicited.” Johnson, 951 So.2d at 301 ; see also State v. Dozier
State v. Johnson 951 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Matthews 859 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
the Louisiana Supreme Court in examining La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Holmes 841 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Cho 831 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Bonnee 826 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); -636 (La.1983)
State v. Camese 791 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Dozier 713 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
a police officer, while testifying on cross-examination by defense counsel, alluded to other crimes or arrests of the defendant.
State v. Pooler 696 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Jack, 554 So.2d at 1296 .
State v. Bryant 694 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
art. 771; State v. Williams, 26,655 (La.App.2d Cir. 3/1/95), .
State v. Parker 661 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Williams 651 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Banks 627 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Perow 616 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Maze 596 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
the police officer, while testifying on cross-examination by defense counsel, alluded to other crimes or arrests of the defendant.
State v. Jones 588 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
The Supreme Court, held that when the defense counsel elicited testimony which implied that the defendant had previously committed other crimes, the state could not be held responsible for such testimony and the defendant cannot claim reversible error on the basis of that testimony which he elicited.
State v. Johnson 587 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Allen, 431 So.2d at 816
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Temple 572 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Wiggins 556 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Jack 554 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Oliver 526 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. Billiot 521 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Walters 514 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Arcement 514 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Gibson 505 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
1984) the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that granting a mistrial is a drastic remedy and, except when mandated by art. 770, lies in the sound discretion of the trial judge.
State v. Banks 503 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Marshall 479 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Collatt 477 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
and cases cited therein.
State v. Fuselier 474 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Collier 474 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985