Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Yarbrough, 418 So. 2d 503.

52 citing documents.

State v. Fairman 173 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Bradstreet 170 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Dawson 154 So. 3d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Jenkins 91 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State ex rel. J.H. 83 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Honeycutt 953 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.03/01/00), -398 , this court discussed the case law history on how the failure to specifically state that the Boykin rights apply to trial does not automatically invalidate the prior offense: (La.
State v. Mitchell 869 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Shed 828 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Shed 828 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
(admissibility of a confession is a question for the trial court, and its conclusion on the credibility and weight of testimony will not be overturned on appeal unless not supported by the evidence).
State v. Lincoln 794 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Distinguished State v. Foy 808 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Stewart 754 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2 the supreme court pointed out *398 3 , in which the failure of the trial court to specifically state that the Boykin trilogy of rights continues into trial, if so elected, invalidated the predicate offense.
State v. Brown 743 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Gaar 746 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
the supreme court pointed out that the court had moved away from Martin, supra .
State v. President 715 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Lott 688 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
the supreme court stated that it was moving away from the rigid application of the rule in *611 Martin .
State v. Killian 677 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Fort 670 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Reynaga 643 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Cittadino 628 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
However, the court noted that it was moving away from a rigid application of this rule.
State v. Shelton 621 So. 2d 769 La. 1993
" But, "[i]n the case of pleas entered more than six years ago, the record must show only that the defendant voluntarily pleaded guilty with a full understanding of `the connotation and consequences.'"
State v. Bodenheimer 613 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Valrie 597 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Terrebone 590 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Strain 573 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Martinez 552 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Cathey, supra; (La.App.
State v. Guillot 550 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Collins 540 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Hensley 537 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
however, our Supreme Court, pointing out the court had moved away from rigid application of such a rule, stated the record must be viewed as a whole to determine whether the defendant understood his rights.
State v. Conley 531 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Jackson 527 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963)
State v. Cheatham 519 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Alexis 514 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Elias 509 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Harden 506 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Brooks 501 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Cathey 493 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Vampran 491 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Helwig 489 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984)
State v. Lawson 474 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
where the trial court during the previous colloquy advised: "You also give up your right to remain silent, your right against self-incrimination.
State v. Wilson 467 So. 2d 503 La. 1985
State v. Jones 462 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The Louisiana Supreme Court, held in part that prior guilty pleas could serve as a basis for charging the defendant as a multiple offender.
State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Cover 450 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Brown 444 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Murray 436 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Although the colloquy does not include the specific language that defendant could remain silent at trial as discussed in State v. Martin, supra, and State v. Age, supra, [6] In all other respects, including as regards the waiver of jury trial, the transcript shows that the judge sufficiently questioned the defendant about his Boykin rights.
State v. Edwards 434 So. 2d 395 La. 1983
State v. Smith 433 So. 2d 688 La. 1983