Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Campbell, 404 So. 2d 1205.

816 citing documents.

State v. Miller 473 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. King 471 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Perry 470 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Grow 467 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State in Interest of Johnson 461 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Solomon 461 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 457 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Humphrey 445 So. 2d 1155 La. 1984
1982) (fifteen years); (twenty-one years); (twelve years); (six years); (ten years); (La.
State v. Gatson 441 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Dugas 441 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Stone 438 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the court made the following observation: *1247 “The imposition of a sentence, even though within statutory limits, may violate a defendant’s right, under the Louisiana Constitution, against excessive punishment.
State v. Remedies 438 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
This provision states, in pertinent part: “No law shall subject any person to euthanasia, to torture, or to cruel, excessive or unusual punishment.” Regarding exeessiveness our Supreme Court, reasoned as follows: “The imposition of a sentence, even though within statutory limits, may violate a defendant’s right, under the Louisiana Constitution, against excessive punishment.
State v. Haney 434 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Lemons 430 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Guidry 428 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the court made the following observation: “The imposition oí a sentence, even though within statutory limits, may violate a defendant’s right, under the Louisiana Constitution, against excessive punishment.
State v. Lawson 410 So. 2d 1101 La. 1982
This matter is therefore considered as an appeal ( (La.