DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gray, 404 So. 2d 1215.

22 citing documents.

  • State v. Benjamin 537 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Trichel 535 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Prejean 520 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Walton 498 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Cottingin 496 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Alfonso 496 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Green 480 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    These cases, follow the reasoning set forth in Curry, supra.
  • State v. Johnson 459 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Melton 456 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Sergon 449 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Coats 449 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    (5th Cir. 1983); (1st Cir.1983).
  • State v. Bell 438 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Criticized State v. Lewis 434 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Gray 434 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Edwards 432 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    State v. *320 Bell, (La.App.
  • Criticized State v. Benton 432 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    The state supreme court, held that the trial judge is relieved of his statutory duty to articulate reasons for sentences, where, as here, the specific sentence has been agreed to as a consequence of plea bargaining.
  • State v. Beasley 430 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Buckenburger 428 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Owens 426 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    See and compare Curry, supra
  • State v. Jett 419 So. 2d 844 La. 1982
    Art. 894.1 and to bar the defendant from complaining of the excessive length of the sentence [], we prefer not to do so and will address the issue squarely concluding that our review of possible constitutional error is not absolutely precluded by a defendant's agreement to plead guilty or to receive a particular sentence.
  • State v. Lathers 414 So. 2d 678 La. 1982