Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bickham, 404 So. 2d 929.

143 citing documents.

State v. Anderson 517 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Thibodeaux 531 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Sanchez 516 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
the Louisiana Supreme Court construed Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 215.1 as authorizing an officer in close pursuit to leave his jurisdiction to make an investigatory stop, when, as herein, the officer initiated his pursuit for the purpose of stopping while within his jurisdiction.
State v. Cotton 511 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Larose 510 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Charles 511 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Turner 500 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Louis 496 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Robins 499 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Myers 490 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Dawson 490 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Talley, 446 * (La.App.
State v. Merchant 490 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Supreme Court construed La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Standley 485 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Fraser 484 So. 2d 122 La. 1986
State v. Price 482 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Augustine 482 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed one-on-one identifications: "One-on-one confrontations between a suspect and a victim, while not favored by the law, are permissible when justified by the overall circumstances.
State v. Picot 482 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
both cases involving one-on-one identifications of suspects captured very shortly after armed robberies were committed.
State v. Harris 478 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Green 471 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Kirkley 470 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Austin 470 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Fraser 471 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Court stated: Knowledge that an offense has been committed is often a critical element in establishing reasonable cause.
State v. Smith 461 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Richardson 459 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Oliver 457 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Rea sonable cause for an investigatory stop is something less than probable cause, but *1272 the officer must have articulable knowledge of particular facts, which in conjunction with reasonable inferences drawn therefrom is sufficient to provide reasonable grounds to suspect the party involved of past, present or imminent criminal activity.” ().
State v. McKinney 455 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Crawford 454 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Lowenfield 450 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Weeks 449 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Senior 446 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed one on one identifications.
State v. Washington 444 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Washington 444 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Miller 440 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Square 433 So. 2d 104 La. 1983
State v. Beasley 430 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Simone 428 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Culpepper 434 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
State v. Williams 420 So. 2d 1116 La. 1982
this court said: One-on-one confrontations between a suspect and a victim, while not favored by the law, are permissible when justified by the overall circumstances.
State v. Varnell 410 So. 2d 1108 La. 1982
State v. Thomas 406 So. 2d 1325 La. 1981