DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Stephenson, 412 So. 2d 553.

19 citing documents.

  • State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “To warrant a mistrial, the inference must be plain that the remark was intended to bring to the jury’s attention the failure of the defendant to testify.” State v. Allen, 03-2418, p. 37 (La.6/29/05), ().
  • State v. Paul 90 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    “To warrant a mistrial, the inference must be plain that the remark was intended to bring to the jury’s attention the failure of the defendant to testify.”
  • State v. Pickrom 732 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Jackson 726 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Simon 617 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    In support, which states that to warrant a mistrial, the inference must be plain that the remark was intended to bring to the jury’s attention the failure of the defendant to testify.
  • State v. Powell 598 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    202 , 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983); (La.App.
  • State v. Carson 527 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Carter 522 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Cf State v. Smith, 433 So.2d *1107 688 (La.1983)
  • State v. Newman 491 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Dunbar 483 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Murray 476 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Boutte 447 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 444 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    The proper remedy for a witness’ unsolicited references is admonition.” -557 (La.1982).
  • State v. Cichirillo 440 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Smith 433 So. 2d 688 La. 1983
  • State v. Burkhalter 428 So. 2d 449 La. 1983
  • State v. Ricks 428 So. 2d 794 La. 1983
    third offense reduced to second offense; third offense reduced to first offense; third offense reduced to first offense.
  • State v. Johnson 426 So. 2d 95 La. 1983
    State v. Howard, 262 La.
  • State v. Moore 416 So. 2d 1298 La. 1982
    which was pending in this court when Jones was decided and which was held to be an exception to the prospective application decreed by Jones .