Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bolton, 408 So. 2d 250.

42 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Zarius J. Brown La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State v. Lewis 245 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Williams 190 So. 3d 737 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Landrum, supra, A defendant may insist he appear before jurors with the appearance, dignity, and self-respect of a free and innocent man, presumed innocent until determined otherwise solely on the basis' of the evidence introduced at trial and not on grounds of official suspicion, indictment, conti
State v. Chairs 164 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
does not include sentencing.”
State v. Pierre 125 So. 3d 403 La. 2013
(phrase “verdict or judgment of the court” in La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Carper 107 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
2d Cir.1984), writ denied
State of Louisiana v. Edward Charles Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
11 Additionally, the “Defendant on September 29, 1981, filed a ‘Motion to Remand Pursuant to Article 854, Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure,’ attaching a ‘Motion for a New Trial’ which he filed in the District Court, alleging the existence of newly discovered evidence.” The verdict in this matter was rendered on
State v. Roberts 966 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Watson 900 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
2d Cir.1984), writ denied, *335 (La.1983)
State v. Guerra 834 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
2nd Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Landrum 796 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Russell 726 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
See: Taylor v. United States, 414 U.S. 17, 19 , 94 S.Ct.
State v. Reed 712 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
851(3) & 853; -254 (La.1981).
State v. Banks 699 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95); ; (La.App.
State v. Jones 653 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Smith 587 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Isaac 544 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
App. 2nd Cir.1984), writ denied, State v. Francis, 337 So.
State v. Jenkins 540 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Will 536 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Duplissey 529 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Anderson 526 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Bonnett 524 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Anderson 517 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Fisher 507 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Johnson 506 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Frith 499 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Olsen 496 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Lowery 491 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Feazell 486 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
App. 2nd Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Trigueros 485 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
605 (1903).” [Emphasis added] (La.App.
State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
a witness in a trial for aggravated crime against nature muttered under his breath that the victim was being "railroaded."
State v. McKoin 485 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
1041 , (1950); State v. Raymond, 258 La.
State v. Bindom 460 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Helsley 457 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
wherein the Supreme Court further noted that notwithstanding the general rule against leading questions, the matter is largely within the discretion of the trial court and in the absence of palpable abuse of that discretion resulting in prejudice to the accused, a finding of reversible error is not warrante
State v. Casimier 454 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Wall 452 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Buchanan 439 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Jones 439 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Kohler 434 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. White 430 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Quimby 419 So. 2d 951 La. 1982