Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Age, 417 So. 2d 1183.

34 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. George Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
With respect to the issue in the present case, advice regarding the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination has been deemed essential to a valid guilty plea in Louisiana, (on reh’g); except when it is not.
State of Louisiana v. Joey Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Balsano 11 So. 3d 475 La. 2009
With respect to the issue in the present case, advice regarding the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination has been deemed essential to a valid guilty plea in Louisiana, (on reh’g); except when it is not.
State v. Williams 839 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Stewart 827 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Montalban 810 So. 2d 1106 La. 2002
State v. Foy 808 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Madison 743 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Walker 747 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Santiago, supra ; State v. McHenry, supra .
State v. Gaar 746 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Kunzman 741 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Dumas 703 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
(on rehearing); (La.App.
State v. Cittadino 628 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Brew 593 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. McHenry 573 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Santiago, supra.
State v. Lewis 557 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Richard 550 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Guillot 550 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Collins 546 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
(on rehearing) (La.1982)
State v. Ross 542 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
The defendant cites and relies on State v. Age, on rehearing (La.
State v. Hensley 537 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Kelly 524 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Stansell 494 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
State v. Junegain 478 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
This waiver of rights form which supplements the minute entry, in clear and concise language
State Ex Rel. Turner v. Maggio 463 So. 2d 1304 La. 1985
State v. Britton 450 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Robinson 442 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Murray 436 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Hill 434 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Buckenburger 428 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Bland 419 So. 2d 1227 La. 1982
(1982), rendered by a three-man majority, with the author assigning additional concurring reasons, a fourth Justice concurring in the result and three Justices dissenting, may on its face also seem to sustain the defense position here.
State v. Santiago 416 So. 2d 524 La. 1982
on rehearing, I seriously question whether the state's burden is ever met merely by the introduction into evidence of the waiver of rights form without also the introduction of a contemporaneously recorded transcript of the colloquy between the trial judge and the defendant conducted during the guilty plea p
State v. Yarbrough 418 So. 2d 503 La. 1982