DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Washington, 406 So. 2d 191.

14 citing documents.

  • State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Robinson 39 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    art. 556.1, (1981), noted that a colloquy by the trial judge should include an attempt to ascertain that the defendant understands the permissible sentencing range.
  • State v. Reynolds 716 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    the court noted that the United States Supreme Court in Boykin advised that the trial court conduct an onthe-record examination of the defendant which should include an attempt to satisfy itself that the defendant understands, among other things, the nature of the charge against him and the permissible rang
  • State v. Johnson 713 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jones 691 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    the court noted that the United States Supreme Court in Boykin advised, although not expressly required, that the trial court conduct an on-the-record examination of the defendant which should include an attempt to satisfy itself that the defendant understands, among other things, the nature of the charge a
  • State v. Shelton 621 So. 2d 769 La. 1993
  • State v. Whitaker 543 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    the United States Supreme Court in Boykin advised the trial court to conduct an on-the-record examination of the defendant which should include an attempt to satisfy itself that the defendant understands, among other things, the nature of the charge against him and the permissible range of sentences for the
  • State v. Johnson 533 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    the Court stated: "In Boykin the United States Supreme Court also advised (if it did not expressly require) the trial court to conduct an on-the-record examination of the defendant which should include an attempt to satisfy itself that the defendant understands the nature of the charges, his right to a jury
  • State v. White 458 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bell 438 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Lewis 434 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Edwards 434 So. 2d 395 La. 1983
  • State v. Benton 432 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Age 417 So. 2d 1183 La. 1982