DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 426 So. 2d 1323.

43 citing documents.

  • State of Louisana Versus Dan Robertson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • State Of Louisiana v. Michael Young La. 2021
  • State Of Louisiana v. Ricky Armentor La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana v. Patrick Michael Shelvin AKA - Patrick Shelvin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    the defendant’s conviction for attempted simple burglary was reversed because the State failed to prove he had the requisite intent to commit a felony or theft.
  • State v. Shelvin 181 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    the defendant’s conviction for attempted simple burglary was reversed because the State failed to prove he had the requisite, intent to commit a felony or theft.
  • State v. Thomas 102 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    which held that responsive verdicts are limited to those listed in Article 814.
  • State v. Wilson 956 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    The Court also discussed the specific intent to commit a felony or a
  • State v. Wright 840 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    14:54 impermissibly removes from the trier of fact the determination of which form of arson was attempted; (2) the statute does not inform defendant of the nature and cause of the crime charged, and (3) the statute is unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous since it does not apprise defendant of a definite penalty.
  • State v. Bass 767 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hennis 734 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Hall 647 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    which held that responsive verdicts are limited to those listed in Article 814.
  • State v. Corvers 646 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Doucet 638 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Distinguished State v. Augustus 633 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    in which the court found that the statement of the defendant that he was sick and needed medical treatment (apparently for mental illness) was consistent with the victim's testimony and other evidence.
  • State v. Black 627 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    wherein the court found a reasonable hypothesis of innocence when a "drunk" or "sick" intruder claimed he entered a house to get help for his illness.
  • State v. Major 597 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. McCall 577 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Davis 546 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. McIntyre 544 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Thomas 540 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Chaney 537 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State ex rel. Nelson 533 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    in each of which cases the court found the evidence was insufficient to prove intent to commit theft or felony in a prosecution for attempted burglary or burglary.
  • State v. Skipper 527 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Bay 529 So. 2d 845 La. 1988
  • State v. Jacobs 504 So. 2d 817 La. 1987
  • State v. Everett 505 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Freeman 506 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Brown 504 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Scott 496 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Nelson 487 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Steward 483 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    For example, defendant lived two doors from the victim’s premises and produced evidence that he had gone into their house in a dazed condition to get them to take him to the hospital.
  • State v. Williams 479 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    where such a fear was held not to be reasonable.
  • State v. Moore 477 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Rounds 476 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Torres 470 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    State v. Lockhart, supra
  • State v. Clark 466 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Patterson 459 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Specific intent to commit theft or other felony is required for attempted simple burglary, , (La.1983); and may be inferred from the circumstances.
  • State v. Robinson 442 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Jacobs 435 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    a conviction of attempted simple burglary was reversed because the state failed to prove the defendant had the requisite intent to commit a felony or theft.
  • State v. Ricks 428 So. 2d 794 La. 1983
  • State v. Pike 426 So. 2d 1329 La. 1983