Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 410 So. 2d 1043.
- State v. Cann 460 So. 2d 1096 La. 1984
- State v. McKethan 459 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Smith 457 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Jones 452 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Downing 451 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Sewell 448 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Palmer 448 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. James 447 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Chaney 444 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Stone
438 So. 2d 1245
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
” Particularly of interest is a footnote in State v. Williams, supra, in which the Supreme Court states: “Both arrests and convictions may be considered in imposing sentence, as long as defendant, as here, is given notice of the derogatory information and is afforded a chance to speak in mitigation.” In the
-
State v. Cruz
438 So. 2d 1251
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
(La.19820.” where the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “[t]he choice of sentences within the statutory range lies within the sound discretion of the trial judge, subject only to the constitutional prohi
-
State v. Haney
434 So. 2d 1264
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See: State v. Fleming, supra.
- State v. Smith 431 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Chaisson 425 So. 2d 745 La. 1983
- State v. Washington 414 So. 2d 313 La. 1982
- State v. Washington 414 So. 2d 313 La. 1982