Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kersey, 406 So. 2d 555.

69 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Ivory D. Franklin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Harrison Buckner Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
In that case, the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that references during trial to 3 State v. George, 95-110 (La.
State of Louisiana v. John Randal Eakins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State v. Robinson, 896 So.2d at 1126
State Of Louisiana v. Torrance Verdin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State a Kersey, n.2 ( La.
State v. Barr 275 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Kersey , , 560, n.2 (La.
State v. Carter 257 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Law 189 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Duong 148 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Montoya, 340 So.2d at 560 .
State v. Adams 142 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Montoya, 340 So.2d at 560 .
State v. Parker 141 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
See State v. George, 95-0110 (La.10/16/95)
State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Dalcourt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Robinson, 896 So.2d at 1126
State v. Pierce 80 So. 3d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Robinson, 896 So.2d at 1126
State v. Washington 72 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Joseph 71 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Collins 30 So. 3d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Allen 5 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Longo 8 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Buckley 4 So. 3d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Bradley 997 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
the Louisiana Supreme Court reasoned that the prosecutor made a reference to the defendant's post- Miranda silence to show that the jury had all the statements made by the defendant.
State v. Myers 981 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Valentine 929 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Williams 902 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Robinson 896 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Olivieri 860 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Jones 814 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Crotwell 818 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Stelly , 93-1090 at p. 6, 635 So.2d at 728 .
State v. Varnado 737 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
there was questioning of the police officer as to whether at a certain point the defendant ceased talking.
State v. Colarte 688 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Stelly, 93-1090 (La.App.
State v. Steward 681 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Matthews 649 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Jones 648 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Stelly 635 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Roy 606 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. English 582 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Simmons, supra; (La.
State v. Carroll 546 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Mullins 537 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Johnson, supra; "
State v. Hilburn 512 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Arvie 505 So. 2d 44 La. 1987
in which the defendant answered a series of questions by the police before invoking his right to remain silent, and this court held that the officer's reference to this fact merely explained how the interrogation was concluded, rather than calling attention to the silence.
State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Larsen 489 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Sanchez 462 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Lewis 452 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Brogdon 457 So. 2d 616 La. 1984
State v. Bailey 457 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Insofar as the length of the sentence, (La.
State v. Welcome 458 So. 2d 1235 La. 1984
State v. Foley 456 So. 2d 979 La. 1984
State v. Summit 454 So. 2d 1100 La. 1984
in which the defendant answered a series of questions by the police before invoking his right to remain silent, and this court held that the officer's reference to this fact merely explained how the interrogation was concluded, rather than calling attention to the silence
State v. Coats 449 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Ratcliff, supra