DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Coleman, 406 So. 2d 563.

60 citing documents.

  • State v. Walker 221 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    1489 , 12 L.Ed.2d 653 (1964); (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jared Paul Pontiff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    -11 (La.1987) (- 49 (La.1981)); -59 (La.1981) (a privilege may be asserted only as to particular questions).
  • State v. Pontiff 166 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    -11 (La.1987) (-49 (La.1981)); -59 (La.1981) (a privilege may be asserted only as to particular questions).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jaymes Larmar Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    1022 (1982); the supreme court in Brown stated: 2 No witness can be forced to criminate himself, but the judge is not bound by the witness’ statement that the answer would criminate him, when from the nature of the question asked and the circumstances of the case such statement can not be
  • State v. Harris 157 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1022 , 71 L.Ed.2d 308 (1982); the supreme court in Brown stated: la2Darby, Edwards, and Coleman all held that question by question invocation of the privilege was not necessary under circumstances in which the witness invoking the privilege was charged with participating in the same crime as the defendant on trial and in which it was ap
  • State v. Davis 128 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, § 16 of the Louisiana Constitution provides that, "[n]o person shall be compelled to give evidence against himself.” A witness may only invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination only in response to questions where the witness “has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer.”
  • State v. Barthelemy 32 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    This right is “confined to instances where the witness has a reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer.” citing Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 487 , 71 S.Ct.
  • State v. White 22 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Lawrence 5 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Eugene Dunn, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Irish 807 So. 2d 208 La. 2002
  • State in Interest of Jw 801 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
    1982); -59 (La.1981)(a privilege may be asserted only as to particular questions).
  • State v. Haddad 767 So. 2d 682 La. 2000
  • State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
  • State v. Jordan 719 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Gerard 685 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    -67 (La.1981); State v. Edwards, supra .
  • State v. Goodwin 640 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Larpenteur 636 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Carson 598 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Fleming 574 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Smith 573 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    Similarly, we declined to require the question by question assertion of the privilege by two witnesses charged with crimes related to the offenses for which the defendant was being tried.
  • State v. Marler 560 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Boyd 548 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    State v. Darby, supra; State v. Wilson, supra.
  • State v. Richardson 533 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    3553 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1399 (1983); (La.
  • State v. Collins 535 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Gray 526 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985); (La.App.
  • State v. Schlessinger 525 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Brown 514 So. 2d 99 La. 1987
    (citing Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 487 , 71 S.Ct.
  • State v. Paul 499 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Campbell 461 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. James 459 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jones 457 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bailey 457 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 453 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Booth 448 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Palmer 448 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Young 448 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    State v. Darby, supra; State v. Wilson, supra.
  • State v. Franklin 449 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Watson 449 So. 2d 1321 La. 1984
  • State v. Davis 445 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Barber 445 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Crawford 441 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Wade 442 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Becnel 441 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Ourso 438 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    certiorari denied, 439 U.S. 1059 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ruple 437 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983