Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Reeves, 427 So. 2d 403.

20 citing documents.

State v. Young 245 So. 3d 353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
1993), citing State v. Reeves , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kayla Brignac La. 2017
Although this court gives “careful consideration to the United States Supreme Court interpretations of relevant provisions of the federal constitution … we are not bound by them in construing the Louisiana Constitution.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Mitchell A. Flemming, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Flemming 194 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Montgomery La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Montgomery 158 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Garland Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir.), writ denied, ( (dissenting opinion of Justice Dennis)), the court noted: “The universal interpretation of provisions similar to Article 1, Section 5 and the Fourth Amendment .
Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System 128 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
3 Cir.), writ denied, ( (dissenting opinion of Justice Dennis)), the court noted: “The universal interpretation of provisions similar to Article 1, Section 5 and the Fourth Amendment ...
State v. Tucker 626 So. 2d 707 La. 1993
(1982) (Dennis, J., dissenting).
State v. Peterson 619 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Caldwell 616 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Kirk v. State 526 So. 2d 223 La. 1988
[2] this court held on rehearing that the government's recording of the defendant's confidential conversation with an informer, taken with only the consent of the informer, was not an unreasonable invasion of privacy and did not violate the defendant's rights under the federal and state constitutions.
State v. Marks 503 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
[1] The Louisiana Supreme Court held, that "the use of electronic surveillance equipment, which is hidden from view on the person of a consenting party to a conversation, does not `invade the privacy' of the other party or parties in the conversation within the meaning of our Constitution, and, therefore, the warrant requirement does not a
State v. Taylor 483 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The Louisiana Supreme Court, on rehearing, carefully analyzed the issue and held: "...
State v. Serigny 481 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Louisiana Supreme Court, on rehearing, held that warrantless consensual electronic surveillance did not invade the defendant's privacy within the meaning of the Louisiana Constitution, Article I, § 5.
State v. Hussey 469 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Rios v. U.S., 364 U.S. 253 , 80 S.Ct.
State v. Cann 460 So. 2d 1096 La. 1984
State v. Clark 454 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
(dissenting opinion of Justice Dennis).
State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 763 La. 1983
State v. Terracina 430 So. 2d 64 La. 1983
*67 on rehearing January 10, 1983, rejected that same contention and upheld a warrantless eavesdrop by state agents.