Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 414 So. 2d 689.

51 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Richard Michael Deidrich La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Chester 208 So. 3d 338 La. 2016
State v. Lundy 195 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In support of this argument, (holding that, in the case of a 17 year old attending special classes for the mentally disabled, “...
State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
of 68 and who did not know his own age intelligently waived rights, which were explained in simplistic terms that he apparently understood); (La.
Floyd v. Cain 62 So. 3d 57 La. 2011
State v. Doyle 56 So. 3d 948 La. 2011
ing conviction for armed robbery on grounds that trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to change his plea from not guilty to a dual insanity plea on the basis of evidence that he was classified as borderline mentally retarded and that his low mentality impaired his ability to make rational everyday decisions “and to determine ‘right or wrong’ in certain situations”); (testimony offered by the defendant at trial in connection with his dual insanity plea “established to a certainty” that
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
was educable and could be made to understand rights, police officers testified defendant understood his rights in part because of his prior criminal history); -87 (La.1981) (19-year-old who had IQ of 68 and who did not know his own age intelligently waived rights, which were explained in simplistic terms that he apparently understood); ("`[M]oderate mental retardation and low intelligence or illiteracy do not of themselves vitiate the ability to knowingly and intelligently waive constitutional r
State v. Beaner 974 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Brown 965 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
1978)(rev'd); (rev'd), (second degree); (rev'd); (aff'd); (rev'd); (La.
State v. Harris 892 So. 2d 1238 La. 2005
[47] (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (aff'd)(commuted to life by Governor); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); rev'd Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 , 115 S.Ct.
State v. Raiford 846 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Based on the foregoing, and Green.
State v. Pugh 831 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Based on the foregoing, and Green .
State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
See e.g., State v. Jones, 94-0459 (La.7/5/94), ; (La.
State v. Bourque 757 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95); .
State v. Walker 681 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Jones, 94-2579, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Campbell 673 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Jones 668 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Green 655 So. 2d 272 La. 1995
State v. Green 655 So. 2d 252 La. 1995
Dr. Zimmerman testified that hpGreen was only “mildly retarded,” a condition he stated was shared by around “3% of the population.” (La.
State v. Green 634 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Stovall 631 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
the Supreme Court of Louisiana held that a trial judge did not abuse his discretion in finding that the defendant’s statement was knowingly and voluntarily made notwithstanding an I.Q.
State v. Robinson 624 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Ether 572 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Smith 557 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Cage 554 So. 2d 39 La. 1989
468 , 74 L.Ed.2d 617 (1982); (rem'd for resentencing); cert.
State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
State v. Guy 542 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Bennett, 345 So.2d at 1138 .
State v. McKinney 537 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Messiah 538 So. 2d 175 La. 1988
State v. Burnes 533 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Herring 527 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Gray 526 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Thompson 516 So. 2d 349 La. 1987
468 , 74 L.Ed.2d 617 (1982); cert.
State v. Brown 514 So. 2d 99 La. 1987
468 , 74 L.Ed.2d 617 (1982)
State v. Roy 502 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
And while they are not pleasant, we cannot say these photographs are "so gruesome as to overwhelm reason," or that whatever prejudicial effect they might have had on the jury outweighed their evidentiary value.
State v. Lasseigne 464 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Sanders 463 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Loyd 459 So. 2d 498 La. 1984
Since the greater danger lies in the possibility that jurors may speculate erroneously on this relevant matter of legitimate concern ( [La.
State v. White 458 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Charles 450 So. 2d 1287 La. 1984
State v. King 444 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Kirkpatrick 443 So. 2d 546 La. 1983
State v. Brown 434 So. 2d 399 La. 1983
State v. Berry 430 So. 2d 1005 La. 1983
State v. Knighton 436 So. 2d 1141 La. 1983
State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31 La. 1983
State v. Robinson 421 So. 2d 229 La. 1982