Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lavigne, 412 So. 2d 993.
-
State of Louisiana Versus Orlando Washington
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
In reviewing a pretrial motion for severance, the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that “[i]t is incumbent upon us to review the validity of the ruling without regard to whether at trial substantial other evidence was introduced or whether his conviction would have been a certainty irrespective of the joint trial.” (La.
-
State of Louisiana Versus Daveon Gilmore
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
In reviewing a pretrial motion for severance, the Louisiana Supreme Court, has held that “[i]t is incumbent upon us to review the validity of the ruling without regard to whether at trial substantial other evidence was introduced or whether his conviction would have been a certainty irrespective of the joint trial.” Duckett, 119 So.3d at 178 ( (La.
-
State of Louisiana Versus Davon Gilmore
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
In reviewing a pretrial motion for severance, the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that “[i]t is incumbent upon us to review the validity of the ruling without regard to whether at trial substantial other evidence was introduced or whether his conviction would have been a certainty irrespective of the joint trial.” Duckett, 119 So.3d at 178 ( (La.
- State of Louisiana Versus Malcolm J Reed La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Santana Woolens La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
-
State of Louisiana Versus Gilbert J. Burciaga
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
1/10/14), this Court stated: In reviewing a pre-trial motion for severance, (La.
-
State Of Louisiana v. Dylan Craddock
La. 2023
State v. Lavigne , -97 (La.
-
State v. Sandifer
249 So. 3d 142
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
art. 842 (providing that, "[i]f an objection has been made when more than one defendant is on trial, it shall be presumed, unless the contrary appears, that the objection has been made by all the defendants"); see also State v. Lavigne , , 995 (La.
-
State v. Duckett
119 So. 3d 168
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In reviewing a pre-trial motion for severance, the Louisiana Supreme Court, held: “It is incumbent upon us to review the validity of the ruling without regard to whether at trial substantial other evidence was introduced or whether his conviction would have been a certainty irrespective of the joint trial.” 20 La.
-
State v. Holmes
119 So. 3d 181
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In reviewing a pre-trial motion for severance, : “It is incumbent upon us to review the validity of the ruling without regard to whether at trial substantial other evidence was introduced or whether his conviction would have been a certainty irrespective of the joint trial.” 19 La.
- State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Foret 685 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
- State v. Smith 591 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- State v. Isaac 487 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
State v. Hodge
457 So. 2d 152
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Thibodeaux, supra; State v. Webb, supra.
- State v. Webb 424 So. 2d 233 La. 1982