Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fontenot, 408 So. 2d 919.

35 citing documents.

State v. Walker 929 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Carr 738 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
14:98(A), has held that “[i]n order to convict an accused of driving while intoxicated the state need only prove that (1) defendant was operating a vehicle or other conveyance; and (2) that defendant was under the influence of alcoholic beverages or some other type of drug.”
State v. Lambert 720 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Richoux 714 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Graves 675 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
State v. Corvers 646 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Chapman 625 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. West 617 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
The elements of DWI (2d) are that the defendant operated a motor vehicle, that he was operating it while under the influence, and that he had a valid prior conviction for DWI, LSA-R.S.
State v. Girouard 615 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In this case, “[i]n order to convict an accused of driving while intoxicated the state need only prove that (1) defendant was operating a vehicle or other conveyance; and (2) that defendant was under the influence of alcoholic beverages or some type of drug.”
State v. Kent 610 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Taylor 585 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Sheldon 541 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Hall 537 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Weilbaecher 534 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Willson 534 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Pitre 532 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Pitre 532 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Broussard 532 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In this case, “[i]n order to convict an accused of driving while intoxicated the state need only prove that (1) defendant was operating a vehicle or other conveyance; and (2) that defendant was under the influence of alcoholic beverages or some type of drug.”
State v. Clark 529 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Garrett 525 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hargrove 522 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
1 However, Dixon, C.J. concurring at 921.
State v. Champagne 520 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Williams 515 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Phillips 514 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
See LRS 14:8, 9, 12, 32; LRS 15:271, 438
State v. Davis 505 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Washington 498 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Washington 498 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
City of Alexandria v. Webster 490 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State ex rel. Bland 471 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Wheat 471 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Holmes 462 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Landry 463 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Austin 458 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
: Operating a vehicle while intoxicated is defined as “the operating of any motor vehicle, aircraft, vessel or other means of conveyance while under the influence of alcoholic beverages, narcotic drugs, central nervous system stimulants, hallucinogenic drugs or barbituates.” R.S.
State v. Allen 440 So. 2d 1330 La. 1983