Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ford, 407 So. 2d 688.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Darren Bridges La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
  • State v. Barnett 118 So. 3d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Young 895 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • Louisiana Farms v. LA. Dept. of Wildlife 685 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Davenport 615 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    The Supreme Court affirmed a where an appellant stopped for a traffic violation was charged with possession of a firearm by a felon because a gun was found in the car; he was convicted of attempted possession of a firearm and argued that the verdict was not responsive under the facts of the case.
  • State v. Wright 598 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Bracken 506 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    In reaching our finding, wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the seizure of evidence under facts similar to those presented herein.
  • State v. Ebey 491 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    the court stated: "Finally, defendant assigns error in the jury's returning a verdict of attempted unlawful possession of a firearm, argues that attempt cannot be a responsive verdict under the facts of the case.
  • State v. Dorociak 493 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    an officer’s shining a flashlight into a car was perceived as an intrusion but justified for the protection of the officers.
  • State v. Burns 471 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    However, the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that the use of a flashlight in order to see into the interior of an automobile does not defeat the plain view doctrine.
  • State v. Crayton 470 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Williams 470 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Westfall 446 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    In its brief the State exerts little effort to defend the validity of the affidavit in support of the search warrant and relies on the "plain view"
  • State v. Husband 437 So. 2d 269 La. 1983