DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Belgard, 410 So. 2d 720.

122 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Gladue Joseph Istre A/K/A Joey Istre La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State Of Louisiana v. Robert George Garner, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    See Apodaca v. Oregon,3 406 U. S. 404, 92 S. Ct. 1628, 32 L. Ed. 2d 184 ( 1972); State v, Be/pard, ( La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Nathan Curry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    See Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404, 92 S. Ct. 1628, 32 L.Ed.2d 184 ( 1972); ( La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. James Matthew Cole La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    See Apodaca v. Oregon,4 406 U.S. 404, 92 S. Ct. 1628, 32 L.Ed.2d 184 ( 1972); ( La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Arijoray Lavon Copeland La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Barr 275 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    State v. Belgard , , 724 (La.
  • State v. Brooks 258 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); , 726 (La.
  • State v. Cespedes 241 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    1628 , 1634, 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); , 726 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Reokenski Vodise Thomas AKA Reokenski Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Thomas 258 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    State v. Smith , [ (La.1983) ] ; State v. Tribbet , ; State v. Belgard
  • State ex rel. Collier v. State 222 So. 3d 699 La. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher O. James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. James 216 So. 3d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Flowers 204 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Matthews 200 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    P. art. 841; State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. Arnaud v. State 188 So. 3d 1004 La. 2016
    1628, 1630 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); -27 (La.1982); State v. Shanks, 97-1885, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
  • State v. Gaubert 179 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 11/14/12), ( (issues and objections not raised at trial will not be considered on appeal unless an error is alleged that is discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings without inspection of the evidence); and State v. Ruiz, 06-1755, p. 8 (La.4/11/07), (to preserve the right to
  • State v. Wallace 143 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See also Holmes, 620 So.2d at 439
  • State v. Huey 142 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); State v. Shanks, 97-1885 (La.App.
  • State v. Dorsey 137 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); -27 (La.1982); State v. Shanks, 97-1885 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 131 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); State v. Napoleon, 12-749 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Demarcus W. Law La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Law 110 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hammond 115 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1628, 1630 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); -27 (La.1982); State v. Shanks, 97-1885, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher K. Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    However, the supreme court found the defendant must have objected to the jury charge at trial to preserve a claim of erroneous instruction on the elements of attempted second degree murder.
  • State v. Mayeux 128 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Mason 109 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Robinson, 45,820 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/11) , writ denied, 2011-0381 (La.9/16/11), .
  • State v. Sanders 104 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    art. 103 (an objection is needed to preserve the complaint as to the evidence for appellate review); (issues and objections not raised at trial will not be considered on appeal unless an error is alleged that is discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings without inspection of the evidence); La.
  • State v. Funes 87 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    the Louisiana Supreme Court followed the United States Supreme Court’s jurisprudence, explaining that “ ‘[tjhis court has consistently held C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Miller 83 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the Louisiana Supreme Court followed the United States Supreme Court’s jurisprudence, explaining that “[t]his court has consistently held C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Funes 88 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the Louisiana Supreme Court followed the United States Supreme Court’s jurisprudence, explaining that “ ‘[tjhis court has consistently held C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that the United States Supreme Court upheld the validity of non-unanimous jury verdicts for twelve-person juries, 46 and that “[t]his court has consistently held C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Robinson 57 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    P. art. 841; *1116 State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.
  • State v. Thomas 54 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    the Louisiana Supreme Court followed the United States Supreme Court’s jurisprudence, explaining that “[t]his court has consistently held C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Lomax 35 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    and Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 , 92 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jones 29 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); State v. Shanks, 97-1885, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
  • State v. Harris 22 So. 3d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    and State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.
  • State v. Taylor 21 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); State v. Shanks, 97-1885, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
  • State v. Raymond 13 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    art. 782 provides in pertinent part that “[c]ases in which punishment is necessarily confinement at hard labor shall be tried by a jury composed of twelve jurors, ten of whom must concur to reach a verdict.” the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that the United States Supreme Court has upheld the validity of non-unanimous jury verdicts for 12-person juries, and that “[t]his court has consistently held C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Tillman 7 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); State v. Shanks, 97-1885, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
  • State v. Speed 2 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.
  • State v. Burnes 997 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); State v. Shanks, 97-1885, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
  • State v. Daigle 994 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); State v. Shanks, 97-1885, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
  • State v. Darnell 988 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    P. art. 841; State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.
  • State v. Newton 973 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    P. art. 841; State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Lee 964 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); State v. Shanks, 97-1885, pp. 15-16 (La.
  • State v. Smith 952 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); State v. Shanks, 97-1885, pp. 15-16 (La.
  • State v. Price 952 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006