Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Randolph, 409 So. 2d 554.

47 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Xavier Levi Johnwell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3 Cir. 12/7/94); El–Mumit v. Twenty–First Judicial District Court
State of Louisiana Versus Jamar Williams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
The trial court erred by failing to rule on defendant’s timely pro se motion for new trial prior to sentencing.2 (La.
State v. James 259 So. 3d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Darren Ross Cruz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Cruz 184 So. 3d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Cavalier 171 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
This Court, held that the error required that the sentence be vacated and the matter remanded for resentencing.
State v. Cockerham 111 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
(per curiam); Magee, 496 So.2d at 563 .
State v. Williams 81 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
(per curiam), on rehearing (1982).
State v. Munson 78 So. 3d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(per curiam) (on reh’g 2/5/82).
State v. Common 78 So. 3d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See, State v. Brooks, 00-106 (La.App.
State v. Pettus 66 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(per curiam)(on rehearing, 1982); State v. Christian, 05-635, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Andrews 61 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In Anderson we cited, inter alia, a per curiam decision, for the proposition that the sentence had to be vacated and the case remanded for resen-tencing.
State v. Williams 30 So. 3d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(per curiam) (on rehearing, 1982).
State of Louisiana v. Edward Charles Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Washington, 98-0583 (La.
State v. Moss 17 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lewis 1 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Terrance Cotrell Robinson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Robinson 981 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Pearson 975 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Falcon 956 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Morgan 948 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Christian 924 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Lewis 916 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
per curiam (on rehearing, 1982), the Louisiana Supreme Court dealt with the trial court's failure to rule on a defendant's new trial motion by vacating his sentence and remanding the case to the trial court for a ruling.
State ex rel. T.J. 800 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Wilson, 96-251 (La.App.
State v. Allen 777 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Leonard 758 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Anderson 753 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Stec 749 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Wilson, 96-251 (La.App.
State v. Washington 747 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hodges 749 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Washington 747 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Wilson 683 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Anderson 679 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Townsend 647 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Pineyro 631 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Brown 620 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Jackson 614 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Moran 584 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Lindsey 583 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Gray 562 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
the Louisiana Supreme Court vacated defendant’s sentence and remanded the case to the trial court for consideration of his motion for a new trial after finding the record devoid of any evidence that such motion had been disposed of before sentencing as mandated by La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Smith 553 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Stevenson 525 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
El-Mumit v. Twenty-First Judicial District Court 500 So. 2d 414 La. 1987
El-Mumit v. TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DIST. COURT 500 So. 2d 414 La. 1987
State v. Magee 496 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Blackburn 444 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Gaspard 433 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
A wherein the Court ruled: “However, counsel for Harold Randolph has called our attention to an error in his defendant’s sentencing.