Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Neslo, 433 So. 2d 73.

120 citing documents.

State v. Sullivan 596 So. 2d 177 La. 1992
State v. Osborne 593 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Moseley 587 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Savage 575 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries 567 So. 2d 1081 La. 1990
1979); 989, n. 4 (La.1978); Thus, the fact that an officer did not believe there was probable cause and proceeded on a consensual or Terry-stop rationale would not foreclose the state from justifying the custody by proving probable cause.
State v. McGraw 564 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Broussard 560 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
If this is done it shall not affect the sufficiency of the specific indictment form authorized by this article.'" at 81, 82.
State v. Woolridge 555 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Lambert 550 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Richard 550 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Panepinto 548 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Smith 541 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Ferguson 540 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Messiah 538 So. 2d 175 La. 1988
State v. Tassin 536 So. 2d 402 La. 1988
State v. Delahoussaye 534 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. Shelton 523 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Jackson 523 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
722 , 58 L.Ed.2d 706 (1978)
State v. Holmes 516 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State Ex Rel. Cockerham v. Butler 515 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Hupp 514 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Cotton 511 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Prestridge 507 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
622; appeal after remand
State v. Tatum 506 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Gordon 504 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Savoy 501 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Caillouet 496 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The Louisiana Supreme Court, held as follows: “ this court held that it was not improper to cross-examine a witness about details of a prior conviction for the purpose of establishing the true nature of the offense.
State v. Williams 499 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Ellzey 496 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Chairs 493 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The lineup is unduly suggestive if the identification procedure displays the defendant such that the witnesses’ attention is focused on the defendant
State v. Manuel 486 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
LRS 14:10; 30.1; LaFave and Scott, Criminal Law, § 35, p. 252 (1972); Ford, supra.
State v. Braggs 487 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Robinson 485 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Harper 485 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. McShane 484 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Phillips 479 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. O'NEAL 478 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Breaux 473 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Boudreaux 471 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Brockett 471 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Brown 470 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Wilson 467 So. 2d 503 La. 1985
State v. Ford 467 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Johnson 467 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Supreme Court stated: This court has also specifically interpreted Article 434 to hold that the testimony of a witness before a grand jury is inadmissble to prove a witness’ prior inconsistent statement at trial State v. Terrebonne, 256 La.
State v. Ashley 464 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Elloie 461 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Hebert 457 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Schreiber 457 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984