DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 407 So. 2d 702.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Tyler N. Derochowski La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
  • State v. Barnett 267 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    1768 , 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983) ; State v. Davis , , 706 (La.
  • State v. Cooper 2 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Franklin 956 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    1768 , 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983); (La.
  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
    State v. Cantanese, supra at 981.
  • State v. Weatherspoon 948 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    1768 , 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983)
  • State of Louisiana v. David Lee Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    1768, 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983)
  • State v. Leger 907 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    1768 , 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983)
  • State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
    1768 , 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983)
  • State v. Turner 859 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Cowart 815 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    1768 , 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983)
  • State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
    1768 , 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983); (La.
  • State v. Sam 761 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    the defendant argues that his conviction must be reversed because the only purpose for tricking his attorney into eliciting this information was to show that he was a person who committed criminal acts.
  • State v. Evans 734 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
  • State v. Powell 598 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Clark 581 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    the defendant complained about the introduction into evidence of a seven year old mug shot in which there was a plaque around his neck reading "Department of Louisiana" and the date it was taken.
  • State v. Arnold 533 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Strong 463 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hocum 456 So. 2d 602 La. 1984
  • State v. Williams 449 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    *63 When the identification of the defendant is in question the court must look into the totality of circumstances to determine whether it is free from the alleged taint, (La.
  • State v. Kennedy 444 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
  • State v. Pendergist 444 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Burns 441 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
  • State v. Culpepper 434 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
  • State v. Tonubbee 420 So. 2d 126 La. 1982
    State v. Catanese, supra.