Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dewey, 408 So. 2d 1255.
- State of Louisiana v. Arthur Anderson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
-
State v. Gorman
166 So. 3d 356
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4; , 1256 n. 1 (La.1982).
-
State v. Smith
152 So. 3d 218
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Rule 2-12.4; State v. Serova, 46,176 (La.App.2d Cir.4/13/11), .
-
State v. Serova
60 So. 3d 723
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Rule 2-12.4, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal
-
State v. Haynes
34 So. 3d 325
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Batiste, 06-824, p. 9 (La.App.
- State v. Addison 8 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Batiste 956 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
- State v. Stevenson 952 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
- State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- State v. Jackson 919 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
- State v. Brown 907 So. 2d 1 La. 2005
- State of Louisiana v. Darrel G. Ledee A/K/A Shane Allen Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State v. Ledee 900 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
- State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
- State v. Morris 882 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Odom 878 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
-
State v. Buckley
839 So. 2d 1193
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
the court held that defendant's incarceration in federal prisons outside Louisiana was a valid reason for trial delays.
-
Overruled
State v. Odle
834 So. 2d 483
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
[5] According to Shepard's, (La.
- State v. McNeal 785 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- State v. Thomas 780 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Lucky 755 So. 2d 845 La. 1999
- State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
- State v. Martin 679 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
State v. Brooks
664 So. 2d 760
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal Rule 2-12.4; (La.
-
State v. Jones
657 So. 2d 262
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal Rule 2-12.4
-
State v. Jones
657 So. 2d 261
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal Rule 2-12.4; (La.
- State v. Mamon 648 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- State v. Richardson 649 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- State v. Walters 630 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- State v. Barker 628 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Hongo 625 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Butler 615 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Hicks 607 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
-
State v. Deal
607 So. 2d 641
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Uniform RulesCourts of Appeal Rule 2-12.4; (La.
-
State v. Rose
606 So. 2d 845
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
U.R.C.A.Rule 2-12.4; (La.App.
-
State v. Burns
602 So. 2d 191
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Uniform Rules Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4
-
State v. Shillow
602 So. 2d 28
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Uniform RulesCourts of Appeal 2-12.4 ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR NUMBERS EIGHT AND NINE Defendant claims the judge made a long, emotional speech immediately before the imposition of sentence, which created an unfair and prejudicial atmosphere, leading to an excessive sentence.
- State v. Hill 601 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
-
State v. DeCuir
599 So. 2d 358
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Uniform RulesCourts of Appeal, 2-12.4.
- State v. Demouchet 595 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-
State v. Maze
596 So. 2d 218
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Uniform RulesCourts of Appeal 2-12.4.
- State v. Tucker 591 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- State v. Lewis 576 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Montgomery 575 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Henderson 571 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Lee 569 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State v. Price 583 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State v. Owens 567 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State v. Brown 567 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990