Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dewey, 408 So. 2d 1255.

254 citing documents.

State v. Braxton 458 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1256 n. 1 (La.1982); , 815 n. 1 (La.App.
State v. Sanford 465 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Champagne 461 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 457 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Floyd 458 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Deville 457 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Marien 457 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Lamb 458 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Bryan 454 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4.
State v. Williams 454 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Dunn 454 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 454 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Chelette 453 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Felo 454 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Mitchell 453 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 452 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Smith 452 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
1st Cir. 1983) ], and the Louisiana Supreme Court [ and cases cited therein], I am of the opinion that the majority erred in not doing the same thing.
State v. Baker 452 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972)
State v. Guidry 450 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Scott 451 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Slaughter 451 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. LaFleur 448 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 447 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Smith, supra; (La.
State v. Smith 448 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Kirts 447 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Freeman 447 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. James 444 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972)
State v. Bellows 442 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Crawford 441 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Sweeney 443 So. 2d 522 La. 1983
State v. Howard 443 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Dore 443 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Williams 438 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Humphries 438 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Myers 438 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court set forth the appropriate analysis for determining whether an accused has been denied his right to a speedy trial: “The right to a speedy trial is guaranteed by the sixth amendment to the federal constitution and by article one, section sixteen of our state constitution.
State v. Guillory 438 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Foat 442 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
455, 459, 463 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
State v. Mitchell 437 So. 2d 264 La. 1983
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
State v. Jimmerson 432 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Sanders 431 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Vallare 430 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Dirden 430 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Therefore, *799 (La.1982), we consider the first assignment of error as abandoned and discuss only his second assignment of error.
State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31 La. 1983
State v. Burkhalter 428 So. 2d 449 La. 1983
State v. Narcisse 426 So. 2d 118 La. 1983
State v. Loyd 425 So. 2d 710 La. 1982
State v. Robertson 421 So. 2d 843 La. 1982