Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sherer, 411 So. 2d 1050.

93 citing documents.

State v. Mims 535 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
2d 666 (La.1982); State v. Taylor, supra; State v. Schamburge, supra.
State v. Porter 533 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Denis 524 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Williams 522 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Leonard 514 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Williams 514 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State ex rel. Berndt v. State 512 So. 2d 428 La. 1987
State v. Kelson 513 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Pegg 513 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Monroe 508 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Gibson 505 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Rattler 503 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. George 501 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Caminita 499 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. McIntyre 496 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Banks 496 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Barnes 496 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Lennon 496 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Holmes 497 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Wilson 495 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Hayes 488 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
The sentence is in error because (1) defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender on each of the three counts when the sentence should have been enhanced on only one conviction, and (2) because of this illegal *1290 enhancement, the sentence on two of the three counts exceeds the maximum allowable by law.
State v. Jackson 488 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Horton 487 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Killion 483 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Williams 482 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
as authority for his first contention that the failure of the trial judge to state the conviction upon which the defendant was multiple billed constitutes reversible error and mandates a remand of this case for resentenc-ing.
State v. Junegain 478 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Mitchell 476 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Carter, 217 La.
State v. Lambert 475 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Algere 474 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
must be extended to this case which involves four completely separate offenses committed on different dates and charged under separate bills of information.
State v. Dufrene 461 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Carlisle 458 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
also a negligent homicide prosecution, the State sought to introduce the *1354 testimony of a witness who saw a truck like the one involved in the accident weaving on the highway and at one point causing another motorist to pull onto the shoulder of the road.
State v. Wells 454 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court held that where convictions on more than one count are entered on the same date, these convictions should be treated as one conviction when applying R.S.
State Ex Rel. Thibodeaux v. Waltzer 444 So. 2d 623 La. 1984
there is no practical difference to relator between the sentences imposed and those to which Sherer suggests he is entitled.
State v. Pelt 448 So. 2d 1294 La. 1984
State v. Singleton 444 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Crawford 441 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
the Louisiana Supreme Court was faced with a similar issue.
State v. Ourso 438 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
certiorari denied, 439 U.S. 1059 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Sherer 437 So. 2d 276 La. 1983
State v. Myles 432 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Lennon 427 So. 2d 860 La. 1983
Furthermore, which misinterpreted La.R.S.