DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Drott, 412 So. 2d 984.

31 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Leday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2860, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981), a search incident to arrest extends to the arrestee’s automobile.
  • State v. Leday 930 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981), a search incident to arrest extends to the arrestee's automobile.
  • State v. Singleton 828 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Hebert, 95-1645 (La.App.
  • State v. Diaz 800 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Hebert, 95-1645 (La.App.
  • State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Hebert, 95-1645 (La.App.
  • State v. Freeman 727 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    2860 , 69 L.Ed.[2d] 768 (1981); (La.App.
  • State v. Wilson 720 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Dillon 719 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981)
  • State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Hebert 676 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Carter 663 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981), a search incident to arrest extends to the arrestee’s automobile.
  • State v. Young 642 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    _ [P]robable cause may exist when the commission of a crime has not been definitely established, but is reasonably probable under the totality of the known circumstances.” Id.
  • State v. Gates 630 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Simms 571 So. 2d 145 La. 1990
  • State v. Roebuck 530 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981)
  • State v. Garcia 519 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Elkins 486 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hale 481 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981); (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 477 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    citing State v. Nicholas, supra .
  • State v. Wilson 457 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that it is permissible for a police officer to search the interior of a automobile after lawfully arresting its occupant when the arrestee remains “in proximity of the vehicle.” The Drott majority cited language from the landmark United States Supreme Court case, New York v.
  • State v. Davis 452 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    (Lemmon, J., dissenting)
  • State v. Palmer 447 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Farber 446 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Ruffin 448 So. 2d 1274 La. 1984
    State v. Commodore, 418 So.2d at 1333 ; (La.
  • State v. Leagea 442 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981); CONTRA:
  • State v. LeCompte 441 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Foster 437 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Ruffin 434 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Commodore, *1249 418 So.2d at 1333
  • State v. Lingle 436 So. 2d 456 La. 1983