Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Howard, 414 So. 2d 1210.

216 citing documents.

State v. Trahan 608 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
held that a sentence imposed within statutory limits will not be deemed excessive in the absence of manifest abuse of discretion.
State v. Hall 606 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Pontiff 604 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Maze 596 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Craig 596 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Grillette 588 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Similarly, note the affirmance of maximum 30- (La.
State v. Alsandor 587 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Crooks 580 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Laviolette 576 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Doyle 574 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Goins 568 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Padgett 554 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Greer 553 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
App. 4th Cir. 1984), writ denied
State v. Mallett 552 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Jones 546 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Hallal 544 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Guillory 544 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Maddox 542 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Volkmann 539 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Celestine 540 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Foster 541 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the high court affirmed a maximum 50 year sentence for attempted aggravated rape and a thirty year sentence for aggravated burglary of a defendant convicted of the attempted aggravated rape of an eighty-six year old woman.
State v. Williams 538 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. McNeil 534 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Berry 534 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Ballard 534 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Broussard 532 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Mallett 535 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Everett 530 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Oubre 524 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Michaels 516 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Bunch 510 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Barnes 489 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Norman 482 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Collatt 477 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. House 476 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Brooks, supra .
State v. Minnifield 475 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Schexnayder 472 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Rivers 470 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. McCutchen 459 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
and State v. Brooks, supra.
State v. Carrier 453 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Allen 451 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Coats 449 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Sepulvado, supra.
State v. Swift 449 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
To be adequate, a court's sentencing statement must indicate that the court considered "not only circumstances militating for incarceration, but also any mitigating factors", statements must contain specific reasons "in relation to the particular offender and the actual offense", (La.
State v. Charles 450 So. 2d 1287 La. 1984
State v. Sewell 448 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Palmer 448 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Knox 450 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Palmer 447 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Sepulvado and Goodman, supra