Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Copeland, 419 So. 2d 899.

44 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jaylon K. Brown La. 2024
1963) (conviction vacated where parties disqualified a sworn juror in an ex parte hearing, outside the presence of the defendant); (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Jaylon K. Brown La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
1963) ( conviction vacated where parties disqualified a sworn juror in an ex parte hearing, outside the presence of the defendant); ( La.
State ex rel. Craddock v. State 225 So. 3d 452 La. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
1989) (bailiff’s entry into the jury deliberation room and conversations with the jury foreperson, regarding how to get an illiterate juror to vote, were presumptively prejudicial because the conversation concerned the mechanics of deliberating on a verdict and occurred without the authority or knowledge of the court or counsel, and the State did not overcome the presumption); (La.
State v. Roberts 116 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
P. art. 831(A)(8); -31 (La.App.
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Joseph T. Plauche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Lastly, wherein the trial judge’s deputy-bailiffs presented gifts, handcuff stickpins, to the jurors.
State v. Plauche 32 So. 3d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Lastly, wherein the trial judge’s deputy-bailiffs presented gifts, handcuff stickpins, to the jurors.
State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
State v. Turner 859 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
(trial judge committed reversible error *929 when he communicated with two jurors outside the presence of the defendant and his counsel "and determined that they were able to continue to serve on the jury without complying with the mandate of LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Dangerfield 816 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Williamson 805 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
585 , (1963) (“[0]nee a juror has been qualified as competent to serve and sworn— all in the presence of the defendant — he cannot thereafter be disqualified as incompetent to serve unless the defendant is present”) (footnote omitted); (trial judge committed reversible error when he communicated with two jurors outside the presence of the defendant and his counsel “and determined that they were able to continue to serve on the jury without complying with La.C.Cr.P.
State v. McKinsey 779 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Haynes 762 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
(3) At the calling, examination, challenging, impanelling, and swearing of the jury, and at any subsequent proceedings for the discharge of the jury or of a juror; (La.
State v. Hampton 737 So. 2d 699 La. 1999
585 , (1963) ("[O]nce a juror has been qualified as competent to serve and swornall in the presence of the defendant he cannot thereafter be disqualified as incompetent to serve unless the defendant is present.") (footnote omitted); (trial judge committed reversible error when he communicated with two jurors outside the presence of the defendant and his counsel "and determined that they were able to continue to serve on the jury without complying with La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Smith 740 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
243 , 93 L.Ed.2d 168 (1986)
State v. Chester 724 So. 2d 1276 La. 1999
See State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96)
State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
This court held there was no error because "[t]he rule of sequestration does not `bar communication between the judge and jury when such communication is within the bounds of trial related necessity.'" ().
State v. Wicken 683 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that a [.¡trial judge conducting proceedings outside of a defendant’s presence to determine a juror’s competency to serve “has the effect of vitiating the entire proceedings.” appeal after remand, cert, denied, 489 U.S. 1091 , 109 S.Ct.
State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
State v. Brooks 661 So. 2d 1333 La. 1995
[1] The evidence concerned violations of the rule of sequestration
State v. Jones 639 So. 2d 1144 La. 1994
(emphasis added) [an argument based on the law governing pardon and commutation or its administration by the governor and other executive officers is entirely inappropriate to a capital sentencing proceeding]; n. 20 (La.1982) ["Prosecutors tread on dangerous ground by mentioning the availability of pardon.
Usner v. Strobach 591 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Duplissey 550 So. 2d 590 La. 1989
when the bailiffs engaged in social programs with the jurors, including presenting each *594 juror with handcuff stickpins.
State v. Smith 554 So. 2d 676 La. 1989
2159 , 85 L.Ed.2d 514 (1985)
State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Weiland 540 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
where the Supreme Court said at page 907: "...
State v. Golmon 536 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Copeland 530 So. 2d 526 La. 1988
Defendant was not retried until August, 1985 or more than six years after the offense, four years after defendant's first trial, (La.
State v. Doss 522 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Guidry 520 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
the defendant was asked to come to the police station to help with a missing persons investigation.
State v. Orgeron 512 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Lambert 506 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Brooks 505 So. 2d 714 La. 1987
State v. Loyd 489 So. 2d 898 La. 1986
State v. Williams 490 So. 2d 255 La. 1986
State v. Byrne 483 So. 2d 564 La. 1986
(and authorities cited therein); cert.
State v. Wingo 457 So. 2d 1159 La. 1984
State v. Glass 455 So. 2d 659 La. 1984
State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Sterling 444 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Clay 441 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983