DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gaskin, 412 So. 2d 1007.

87 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Daveon Gilmore La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana Versus Davon Gilmore La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana Versus Malcolm J Reed La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State Of Louisiana v. Aaron Hurst La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Edwin Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher O. James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. James 216 So. 3d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State ex rel. J.D. 154 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State in the Intrest of T. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State ex rel. T.H. 140 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Duckett 119 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “Justice does not require severance where only the extent of participation of each defendant is at issue.” -13 (La.1982).
  • State v. Holmes 119 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “Justice does not require severance where only the extent of participation of each defendant is at issue.” -13 (La.1982).
  • State of Louisiana v. Marqule Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Craft 99 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Taylor 21 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    where the Court stated in dicta that “(j)ustice does not require a severance where only the extent of participation of each defendant is at issue.” A principal is defined as one who is 11/‘concerned in the commission of a crime, whether present or absent, and whether [he] ...
  • State of Louisiana v. John Stanley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    ts of the statement and distinctly failed to do so.” The State further points out that “the nature of the defense objection was that the tape itself was the best evidence” and urges that, “absent a showing of prejudice to the defendant, a conviction will not be reversed on the ground that the best evidence was not produced,”
  • State v. McGuffie 962 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Jones 891 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Strickland , 94-0025 at p. 23, 683 So.2d at 229
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    the two teenage defendants and a third accomplice grabbed the victim off of the street on Halloween night, threw her into their car, and forced her to perform oral sex on them as they drove through rural Bossier Parish.
  • State v. Dilosa 849 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
    the two teenage defendants and a third accomplice grabbed the victim off of the street on Halloween night, threw her into their car, and forced her to perform oral sex on them as they drove through rural Bossier Parish.
  • State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Strickland , 94-0025 at p. 23, 683 So.2d at 229
  • State v. Williams 754 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 at p. 23, 683 So.2d at 229
  • State v. Burton 727 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    The Supreme Court, stated in dicta that "(j)ustice does not require a severance where only the extent of participation of each defendant is at issue."
  • State v. August 719 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    where the Court stated in dicta that "(j)ustice does not require a severance where only the extent of participation of each defendant is at issue."
  • State v. Jackson 714 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Foret 685 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Morris 669 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    where the Court stated in dicta that “(j)ustice does not require *1274 a severance where only the extent of participation of each defendant is at issue.” This case presents no basis to find antagonistic defenses.
  • State v. Cannon 658 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Tate 657 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Price 636 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Smith 632 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    1330 , 79 L.Ed.2d 725 (1984); (La.
  • State v. Hicks 607 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1981); writ denied
  • State v. Williams 605 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    1330 , 79 L.Ed.2d 725 (1984); writ denied
  • State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Hayes 585 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Moseley 587 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    2438 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1983)
  • State v. Minor 580 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Dickerson 579 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Sneed 571 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Conway 556 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hollingsworth 550 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Panepinto 548 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hallal 544 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Leonard 543 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Martin 543 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Guillory 540 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989