DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Goza, 408 So. 2d 1349.

38 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • State v. Smith 237 So. 3d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    In State v. Goza , , 1352-53 (La.
  • State v. Scott 184 So. 3d 2 La. 2015
    “[t]he reason jfino notice is required as to res gestae evidence is that for evidence of the other crime to so qualify, the other crime must be so closely connected that the indictment or information as to the instant crime is deemed to carry with it notice as to the other crimes as well.” More correc
  • State v. Waterhouse 171 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    (noting that “[t]he prosecution within a reasonable time before trial must furnish in writing to the defendant a particularized statement of the other acts or offenses it intends to offer specifying the exception to the general exclusionary rule upon which it relies for their admissibility.”).
  • State v. Miller 824 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Powell 683 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Broussard 664 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Davis 664 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    art. 404(B); State v. Broussard, 95-792 (La.
  • State v. Allen 663 So. 2d 686 La. 1995
  • State v. Williams 660 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    [2] At the close of trial, to support its objection.
  • State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Martin 645 So. 2d 190 La. 1994
  • State v. Dixon 628 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Rice 626 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Lewis 590 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Addison 551 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Neal 535 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Broussard 527 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    State v. Walker, supra; State v. Kahey, supra; State v. Davis, supra; (conc.
  • State v. Weiland 505 So. 2d 702 La. 1987
    the state convinced a jury that defendant Goza had hired someone to kill her husband.
  • State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Dean 487 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    The general rule is that the prosecution within a reasonable time before trial must furnish in writing to the defendant a statement of other acts or offenses if it intends to offer into evidence specifying the exception to the general exclusionary rule upon which it relies for their admissibility, , (La.1982)
  • State v. Trigueros 485 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Appellant secondly argues that the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce testimony alluding to other acts of purported misconduct by the defendant with the prosecuting witness over a period of years where the notice given by the State was wholly inadequate to meet the standards set by our Supreme Court in State v. Prieur
  • State v. McGary 479 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. O'NEAL 478 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Luwisch 468 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    In the Prieur decision, and in other cases, the Supreme Court said that the State must give a defendant written notice within a reasonable time of its intent to use evidence of other crimes.
  • State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 443 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Our Supreme Court, stated the following: "Evidence of offenses which are part of the res gestae, or convictions used to impeach defendant's testimony, are the only exceptions to the Prieur rules requiring the prosecution to give reasonable, particularized notice to the accused of any other crimes evidence it intends to
  • State v. Franklin 440 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
  • State v. Germain 433 So. 2d 110 La. 1983
    State v. Prieur, supra at 130 .
  • State v. Lindsey 428 So. 2d 420 La. 1983
    [4] State v. Shilling, No. 82-KA-1820 (docketed but not yet set for argument); (a companion to Sawyer )
  • State v. Trahan 425 So. 2d 1222 La. 1983
  • State v. Taylor 422 So. 2d 109 La. 1982
  • State v. Humphrey 412 So. 2d 507 La. 1982