Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Shapiro, 431 So. 2d 372.

503 citing documents.

State v. Gibson 197 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Woodberry 171 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In addition, when circumstantial evidence forms the basis of the conviction, such evidence must consist of “proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which the existence of the main fact may be inferred according to reason and common experience.” (citation omitted).
State v. Bernard 171 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Thomas 171 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In addition, when circumstantial evidence forms the basis of the conviction, such evidence must consist of “proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which the existence of the main fact may be inferred according to reason and common experience.” (citation omitted).
State v. Etienne 172 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Hartford 162 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
-385 (La.1982); see als o State v. Taylor, supra.
State v. Nelson 169 So. 3d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Aguillard 158 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In addition, when circumstantial evidence forms the basis of the conviction, such evidence must consist of “proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which the existence of the main fact may be inferred according to reason and common experience.” (citation omitted).
State v. Miller 160 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
As such, when circumstantial evidence forms the basis of a conviction, such evidence must consist of “proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which the existence of the main fact may be inferred according to reason and common experience.”
State v. Ellis 161 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Armstead 159 So. 3d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
As such, when circumstantial evidence forms the basis of a conviction, such evidence must consist of “proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which the existence of the main fact may be inferred according to reason and common experience.”
State v. Canales 156 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Ramirez 154 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Jacques 157 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Jasper 149 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hamed 147 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Watson 147 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Watkins 146 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Gordon 146 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hatfield 155 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Haynes 144 So. 3d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Mack 144 So. 3d 983 La. 2014
See (on reh’g) *989 (“Assuming without deciding that the due process clause of the federal constitution as espoused in Jackson v. Virginia is not offended by a state conviction supported-by the identical evidence in this record, that constitutional consideration is irrelevant to our disposition of this case
State v. Weathersby 140 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Scott 136 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Laneheart 135 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Nellum 136 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. German 133 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Vessel 131 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Taylor 130 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hamdan 131 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Pierce 131 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Biddy 129 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Allen 129 So. 3d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Vargas-Alcerreca 126 So. 3d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Beaulieu 122 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Santos-Castro 120 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cooper 120 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Taylor 118 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Spells 116 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Brown 115 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Clements 112 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Brown 157 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Johnson 109 So. 3d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. McNair 107 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Thomas 106 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Sipp 104 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Burke 103 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012