Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Shapiro, 431 So. 2d 372.

503 citing documents.

State v. Brady 727 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Nogess 729 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Baker 729 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Martin 730 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Ash 729 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Lewis 727 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson 726 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Bannister 726 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Barthelemy 726 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. DeSilva 726 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. August 719 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Jordan 719 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Smith 717 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Johnson 719 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Atkins 713 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Scott 709 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Douglas 707 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Egana 703 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Parker 696 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Williams 693 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
In addition, when circumstantial evidence forms the basis of the conviction, such evidence must consist of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which the existence of the main fact may be inferred according to reason and common experience
State v. Brown 692 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Gaines 688 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Cortez 687 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Spencer 683 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Mitchell 684 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Gallow 680 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Parker 679 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Page 680 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Matthews 679 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Kimbrough 673 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Williams 672 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Addison 665 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Taylor 662 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Hawkins 667 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Allen 661 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Johnson 660 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Etienne 649 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Cushenberry 650 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Camp 641 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. McLemore 640 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
State v. Lee 637 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Brown 635 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Monds 631 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Black 627 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Chapman 625 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Long 625 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Peterson 623 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Hawthorne 623 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Although in many instances separate and dual applications of the rules will yield the same result, out of an abundance of caution we will proceed to apply each standard separately.”
State v. Gales 622 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993